India
India’s lofty EPS growth expectations are set for a major disappointment. The RBI has overtightened monetary policy despite the absence of any genuine inflationary pressures in India. Fiscal stance is also restrictive. Stay underweight this bourse in EM and Emerging Asian equity portfolios.
The Indian rupee has lost nearly 7% of its value versus the US dollar since the start of the year. Surging commodity prices pushed India’s trade deficit to new lows in June. Meanwhile, portfolio outflows weighed down on the capital account – sending it into…
Executive Summary Following an unprecedented exodus by foreign investors, Indian stocks’ absolute valuations have cheapened significantly. A breakdown in crude oil prices will help put a floor under Indian firms’ profit margins. India’s decent domestic fundamentals indicate that non-financial firms’ topline (revenues) should hold up. That entails only a limited drop in EPS, given that margin compression is late. Lower commodity and crude prices will help tame inflationary pressures; and will necessitate less rate hikes from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The rupee might be at a risk in the near run as the broad US dollar overshoots, but the currency’s medium- and long-term outlooks are positive. That said, Indian stocks’ relative valuations versus their EM and Emerging Asian peers remains far too expensive to recommend an upgrade just yet. Indian Markets Have Witnessed An Unprecedented Exodus By Foreign Investors Bottom Line: Equity investors should stay underweight this bourse in EM and Emerging Asia portfolios for now, but place this market on an upgrade watchlist. Absolute return investors should remain on the sidelines given the strong headwinds faced by global equities. Fixed-income investors should continue to accord a neutral allocation to India in EM and Emerging Asian domestic bond portfolios. Feature Indian equity markets witnessed an unprecedented exodus of foreign investors over the past nine months. Net equity outflows, at $36 billion since October last year, have now reversed the entire foreign equity inflows of $38 billion that took place during the preceding 18 months. Indian stock prices – which are highly sensitive to foreign investor inflows – have fallen in tandem (Chart 1). Chart 1Indian Markets Have Witnessed An Unprecedented Exodus By Foreign Investors Chart 2India Has Rcecntly Underperformed As China Has Outperformed The large selloff by foreigners has been instrumental to India’s recent mild underperformance relative to its EM and Emerging Asian counterparts (Chart 2, top panel). We had tactically downgraded Indian stocks to underweight in March this year, which has so far worked out well. Notably, India’s recent underperformance versus the EM benchmark has been mostly due to investors rushing back into Chinese stocks, which had fallen to very low levels earlier this year. Indian stocks’ performance has been at par with EM ex-China equities in recent months (Chart 2, bottom panel). That said, global macro backdrops are changing gradually. Oil prices have begun to break down, which is a net positive for India, a large crude oil importer. India’s domestic growth indicators also appear to be decent – pointing to a steady top-line (revenues) outlook. This bourse therefore might begin to look attractive again to foreign investors whose Indian equity holdings are now quite low. On the negative side, India’s relative valuations versus EM and Emerging Asia remains very stretched – both by regular measures and in cyclically adjusted terms (Chart 3). Weighing all the pros and cons, we recommend that equity investors stay underweight this bourse in EM and Emerging Asia portfolios for the time being, but put it on an upgrade watchlist. Absolute return investors should remain on the sidelines given the strong headwinds faced by global equities. Is The Multiple Compression Over? The ongoing selloff in Indian stocks can be attributed to derating (Chart 4). The trailing P/E ratio has fallen substantially from a pandemic high of 39 to 21; whereas the forward P/E has also fallen from 24 to 19. Chart 3Indian Markets Are Still Very Expensive In Relative Terms Chart 4The Ongoing Selloff In India Can Be Attributed To Multiple Derating That said, the contraction of multiples, one of the two drivers1 of stock prices, appears to be at a late stage. The reasons are as follows. Chart 5Falling Commodity Prices Will Help Put A Floor Under Indian Firms' Profit Margins As we explained in our previous report on India, commodity prices are the sole source of current inflation in this economy. Receding global commodity prices will therefore rein in the inflationary pressures in general, and producer prices in India in particular. The top panel of Chart 5 is showing that Indian producer prices track global commodity prices closely. Hence, the former is set to decelerate significantly in the next few months. What this means for Indian firms is that their cost of raw materials will ease up. At the same time, since global commodity prices have much less of an impact on India’s consumer inflation, the latter will not subside as much. In other words, CPI will rise relative to PPI, as shown in the middle panel of Chart 5. When this happens, it is usually a positive for firms’ profit margins (Chart 5, bottom panel). As such, in the coming months, one can expect firms’ margins to have some support. If we consider only crude oil, we see a similar dynamic. Any drop in crude prices (shown inverted in Chart 6) do help boost Indian firms’ margins, albeit with a few months lag. Hence, in the months ahead, as crude prices break down, firms’ margins will also find a floor sooner rather than later. Profit margins, in turn, are a major driver of stock multiples (Chart 7). India’s multiples have already fallen to pre-pandemic levels in anticipation of more margin compression in the future. If margins do not compress as much, it’s reasonable to expect that further multiple contractions would also be limited. Chart 6Weaker Crude Prices Are Also Positive For Indian Firms' Margins Chart 7As Margins Compression Ends, So Will Equity Multiple Derating The message is the same if we look at India’s cyclically adjusted P/E (CAPE) ratio: it too has cheapened to the lower end of the past 10-years’ range – thereby already discounting a massive amount of EBITDA margins compression (Chart 8). Chart 8India's CAPE Has Fallen Meaningfully, Already Discounting Material Margin Compression A similar argument can be made in regard to firms’ interest costs. Indian firms’ interest expenses might not rise as much if inflation can be reined in without substantial rate hikes by the RBI. Indeed, India’s headline and core CPI remain largely range-bound (Chart 9) − unlike in most developed economies as well as in Latin America and EMEA. Odds are that they would subside marginally with easing commodity prices. If so, the central bank would be less inclined to raise interest rates considerably. Chart 9Rangebound Headline And Core CPI Mean Too Many Rate Hikes Are Unlikely Chart 10 shows that India’s trailing P/E has fallen to pre-pandemic averages – already discounting a significant amount of future rate hikes. If interest rates do not rise as much as feared previously, further derating of stocks will also be limited. How Much Of An Earnings Squeeze Lies Ahead? Indian firms’ raw material and interest costs are likely to alleviate somewhat. Unit labor costs are also unlikely to rise much as wages remain subdued, and robust capital investments suggests that labor productivity gains would remain decent. All this will stop profit margins from contracting much further. And yet, for corporate earnings growth to continue, firms need rising revenues too. So, the next question is, how much top-line growth can be expected? Chart 11 shows the revenues of major non-financial corporations in India. They have already far surpassed their pre-pandemic levels in both local currency and US dollar terms. The outlook for their future revenues also appears to be satisfactory: Chart 10Multiple Derating May Stop, As Already Discounted Rate Hikes Do Not Materialize Chart 11Indian Firms' Top Line Outlook Is Satisfactory The purchasing managers’ indices for manufacturing and services are all at decent levels of expansion (Chart 12, top panel). Further, if the order books are of any indication, the expansion should continue in the foreseeable future (Chart 12, bottom two panels). Notably, India is not a major exporter of manufactured goods; and therefore, an impending contraction in global consumer goods consumption would not hurt it as much as it would many other EM economies. An industrial outlook survey by the RBI indicates that firms are expecting their capacity utilization and employment count to rise markedly in the near future. This points to a robust economy ahead (Chart 13). Chart 12Robust Order Books Indicate Economic Growth Will Stay Decent Chart 13Firms Are Expecting Rising Capacity Utilization And Employment India’s bank credit impulse has accelerated strongly – which indicates rising economic activity. Industrial production usually follows suit with a couple of months lag, and this time should be no different (Chart 14). Chart 14Accelerating Bank Credit And Industrial Productions Indicate A Robust Economy Finally, strong post-pandemic capex growth indicates that bank loans have much further to accelerate. Notably, leverage in the Indian economy is still low. Bank credit has hovered at around only 50 - 55% of GDP over the past decade. Total debt levels including bond issuance by non-financial firms have also been flattish at a mediocre level of 65 - 70% of GDP. Limited leverage means there is plenty of room to borrow and kickstart a new capex cycle. If that transpires, it will be very bullish for Indian stocks in general, and bank stocks in particular – which has the largest weight in the MSCI India index at 23% More importantly, a capex-led growth would boost Indian firms’ competitiveness and profits in the long run. Capex boosts labor productivity, which helps keep unit labor costs down. That, in turn, improves both competitiveness and profit margins. It will also contribute to alleviating structural inflationary pressures in the economy – as lower unit labor costs would keep prices down. The bottom line is that, given the decent economic growth outlook, the top line of most Indian corporations is unlikely to see a contraction in nominal terms. In that case, a minor drop in their profit margins from current levels would entail that EPS contraction, if any, will also be limited. In sum, the outlook for both drivers of India’s stock prices, multiples and EPS, is not as dire as it appeared earlier this year. That at least warrants to place India on an ‘upgrade watchlist’ in an EM equity basket from the current underweight status. The reason we are hesitant to upgrade it outright is that although India’s absolute valuation has eased, its relative valuation vis-à-vis EM and Emerging Asia remains highly stretched. Finally, in terms of absolute stock prices, the risk-reward of global stocks remains poor as the Fed and US equity markets are on a collision course. As such, investors should wait out the ongoing turbulence before getting back to market. What About The Rupee? Chart 15Peaking Crude Prices Will Help Ameliorate Trade And Current Account Deficits The Indian currency has been depreciating versus the US dollar as both current and capital accounts were under downward pressure. That said, both are likely to get marginally better in the months ahead. High global commodity prices caused India’s trade deficits to slide to new lows in June. The current account balance is also weakening (Chart 15, top panel). If, however, commodity prices have peaked in this cycle (which is our view), India’s trade and current account deficits would ameliorate in the months to come. In regard to the capital account balance − which slipped into a rare deficit recently − the deterioration can be attributed to portfolio outflows. FDI and other capital flows, which are more stable in nature, continue to report decent inflows (Chart 15, bottom panel). Given that foreign portfolio repatriation has largely run its course, odds are that the capital account balance will switch back to surplus in the coming quarters. This is because while net portfolio outflows would recede significantly from current high levels, other components of the capital account will likely stay in surplus given the country’s decent long-term growth outlook. If so, that could mean that the depreciation of the rupee is also late. Chart 16 shows that changes in India’s capital flows greatly impact the Indian currency. While the ongoing risk-off sentiment globally may cause the dollar to overshoot in the near term, the rupee outlook is quite positive over the medium to long term. Chart 16As Portfolio Outflows Wane, Capital Account Will Be Back In Surplus, Benefitting The rupee Chart 17The Rupee Is Extremely Cheap In PPP terms Vis-à-vis The US Dollar Incidentally, the rupee is already extremely cheap vis-à-vis the US dollar in PPP terms. Further depreciation, if any, should therefore be limited. It also makes the rupee attractive for long-term investors (Chart 17). Notably, the rupee did well compared to other EM currencies over the past several years − in line with our view. It should continue to do so, as growth in India will likely stay stronger than most EM economies. That will attract capital from the rest of the world − beyond any near-term jitters − propping up the currency. Finally, as the rupee will be under less downward pressure with the improvement in the balance of payments, the RBI will be less intent to raise policy rates in a bid to mitigate currency depreciation. Less rate hikes, as explained before, is positive for stock prices. Investment Conclusions Currency: Amelioration in both terms-of-trade shock and in portfolio outflows will ease up the downward pressures on the rupee in the months ahead. It will also likely remain among the best performers in the EM world even as an overshoot in the broad US dollar in the near term remains a risk. Equities: The key risk to Indian equities are global developments: the rate hike cycles underway globally, slumping DM growth, a strong US dollar, mediocre Chinese growth, and the negative ramifications of the war in Ukraine. As such, Indian absolute stock prices remain vulnerable in the months ahead. Absolute return investors should therefore stay on the sidelines. India’s relative performance versus its EM counterparts has been highly contingent on relative multiple expansions (Chart 18). The recent diversion between them is therefore untenable. And if history is any guide, the relative multiples and relative stock prices should converge to the downside. This argues for staying cautious on India’s relative performance too. We recommend remaining underweight India in EM and Emerging Asian equity portfolios for now; but put this bourse on an upgrade watchlist in view of decent macro fundamentals in India and falling crude prices. Domestic Bonds: Indian government bonds are not as attractive to EM fixed-income investors as the yield differential vis-à-vis other EMs has already narrowed substantially. Going forward also, the yield differential might not move in India’s favor. The reason is that Indian yields will likely inch up, or at least stay firm, with the economy gaining traction (Chart 19). Chart 18India's Relative Performance Remains At Risk Chart 19Indian Bond Yields May Not Fall Much,As They Move With Economic Growth Notably, an imminent slowdown in global trade will not hurt India’s growth as much as it would most other EM countries. That reduces the odds of Indian yields falling more relative to its EM counterparts. Chart 20Stay Neutral On Indian Bonds As Their Yield Advantage Has Narrowed Substantially We downgraded Indian government bonds from overweight to a neutral allocation in EM and Emerging Asian domestic bond portfolios in March this year. That recommendation still makes sense (Chart 20). Rajeeb Pramanik Senior EM Strategist rajeeb.pramanik@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 The other driver being the EPS (Earnings-per-share); discussed in the next section.
Executive Summary Long-Term Contracts Needed To Increase LNG Supply The EU will have to reverse course and execute long-term contracts with natural gas producers, LNG shippers and pipeline operators to incentivize production of supplies needed to contain energy prices. Long-term contracting will offer the EU an opportunity to address political and economic fragmentation risks via joint taxation policies. This would transform state-level risks via-a-vis energy and military security into joint-and-several obligations. The G7’s plan to cap Russian oil prices will be DOA. The most oil import-dependent EM economies – China and India – will find deeply discounted crude irresistible. Hydrocarbon producers and refiners will increase investments in carbon-capture and storage technology, to maintain their new-found advantage as secure energy sources. Additional subsidies and funding for this technology will be forthcoming. Bottom Line: The hard realities of military conflict and a lack of investment in production and refining will force governments to incentivize substantial investments in hydrocarbons – particularly natural gas and LNG infrastructure – to address global energy scarcity during a time of war. We remain long oil and gas exposures via the COMT ETF, and long equity refining and services exposures via the CRAK and IEZ ETFs. We will re-establish our producer-oriented XOP ETF position if prompt Brent futures trade down to $105/bbl in the front month. We also remain tactically long Brent and eurozone natgas futures and options. Feature The G7 last opined on liquified natural gas (LNG) supply in May, and as was the case this week, it left even casual observers uncertain as to what it is seeking to achieve: It advocated for a halt to further investments in fossil-fuel projects and, at the same time, called for higher LNG supplies to be provided for the EU states.1 The EU faces daunting energy security and supply constraints.2 A deepening energy scarcity will, we expect, push the EU into recession later this year, as natural-gas rationing is invoked to ensure there are sufficient supplies to meet human needs this winter. Natgas scarcity will force the EU to reverse course on its renewable-energy transition in the medium term and prioritize fossil-fuel investments, in our view. Long-term contracting with LNG suppliers will be required to incentivize needed investment in production and transportation to replace Russian gas imports. Such contracting is a necessity for hydrocarbon producers, given governments’ continued calls for no additional fossil-fuel investment. Quicksilver shifts in policy are a continuing source of uncertainty for investors and energy-supply firms. Over time, the EU will have to replace close to 7 Tcf/yr of Russian gas imports (Chart 1, middle panel). This will propel the EU into the ranks of the world’s largest LNG importers (Chart 2). Chart 1EU Needs To Replace ~ 7 Tcf/yr Of LNG Chart 2EU Will Become A World-Class LNG Importer Chart 3Long-Term Contracts Needed To Increase LNG Supply Given the length of contracts typically executed with LNG exporters – in excess of 20-plus years – EU governments will be compelled to allow firms and member states to sign long-term contracts for these supplies. EU governments also will be required to begin planning for and developing LNG importing infrastructure, as these supplies become available over the next 3-5 years. In the meantime, LNG prices will remain under pressure as competition heats up globally ahead of the coming winter (Chart 3). G7 Price-Cap Scheme Will Be DOA The G7’s scheme to impose a price cap on Russian oil exports will be DOA as soon as details are presented. This is because the world’s largest oil import-dependent economies – China and India – not only have long trading histories with Russia, but they also operate their own oil-transport fleets that can circumvent insurance-related obstacles imposed by the US and the UK. China and India already find discounted Russian oil irresistible, and are unlikely to acquiesce to US demands for a price cap. China imports 75% of its 15.5mm b/d of oil consumption, while India imports ~ 85% of the 5mm b/d of oil it consumes. Even if oil importers taking Russia's exports going to the EU were to sign on to a price-cap scheme, Russia could always unilaterally cut its oil and condensate production by 20-30% and force Brent prices sharply higher for remaining contract holders. This would almost surely lead to higher prices – above $140/bbl, based on our earlier estimates – and raise Russia’s net export proceeds in the process, since the G7 does not want all of Russia's oil taken off the market.3 Government Interventions Exacerbate Scarcity Governments of states with contestable elections increasingly are intervening – or attempting to do so – in global energy markets and imposing often-contradictory policies that nominally favor consumers at the expense of energy producers. This almost always is counter-productive: Price caps intended to soften the blow of higher-cost electricity and hydrocarbons discourages the necessary conservation of scarce resources. So-called windfall profits taxes discourage the investment required to address supply scarcity. Higher demand and lower supply does not lead to lower prices. Even grander schemes – e.g., the monopsony cartels floated by G7 member states like the US and EU, along with China – almost surely would reduce the profitability of developing and marketing new energy supplies, which also would exacerbate scarcity of supply by discouraging investment. These quick ad hoc fixes work at cross purposes in solving the problem of global energy scarcity. While they are in keeping with a penchant of governments to demonstrate they are addressing voters’ concerns, such policies mistake a quick response for long-term solutions. Investment Implications The EU will, in our opinion, be forced to reverse course and sign long-term LNG supply contracts to replace Russian natural gas imports. This will not derail its renewable-energy transition strategy, but it will significantly delay it. We remain long oil and gas exposures via the S&P GSCI and COMT ETF, and long equity refining and services exposures via the CRAK and IEZ ETFs. We will re-establish our producer-focused XOP ETF position if Brent trades down to $105/bbl in the front month. We also remain tactically long Brent and eurozone natgas futures and options (see p. 7 below). Housekeeping Notes We were stopped out of our long S&P GSCI position with a gain of 64%. We are getting long again at the close. We also were stopped out of our long 4Q22 $120/bbl Brent calls with a 16% return. Separately, there will be no Commodity Round-Up in this week’s publication. We are broadcasting our Commodity Round-Up today at 9 a.m. EDT. Robert P. Ryan Chief Commodity & Energy Strategist rryan@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Please see The G7 wants to dump natural gas … but not yet published by politico.com 27 May 2022. The report notes, “The G7 called for an end to international investments in fossil fuels by the end of this year and slammed private finance for continuing to back dirty energy — but left a big out for EU countries desperate to replace Russian gas. ‘We acknowledge that investment in [the liquefied natural gas] sector is necessary in response to the current crisis, in a manner consistent with our climate objectives and without creating lock-in effects,’ the ministers said.” 2 Please see One Hot Mess: EU Energy Policy, published 26 May 2022. This report delves into the EU’s post-Cold War foreign policy. For three decades, EU foreign policy largely was set by Germany, the organization's most powerful economy. Successive generations of German politicians championed the idea that the West could bring the former Soviet Union – and later Russia – into the modern world of global trade through Ostpolitik, which had, at its core, a belief in the power of trade to effect political and economic change. This policy is kaput. 3 Please see Higher Gasoline, Diesel Prices Ahead, which we published 2 June 2022. It is available at ces.bcaresearch.com. Investment Views and Themes Strategic Recommendations Tactical Trades Trades Closed in 2022
Executive Summary EU Embargoes Russian Oil The EU imposed an embargo on 90% of Russian oil imports, which will provoke retaliation. Russia will squeeze Europe’s economy ahead of critical negotiations over the coming 6-12 months. Russian gains on the battlefield in Ukraine point to a ceasefire later, but not yet – and Russia will need to retaliate against NATO enlargement. The Middle East and North Africa face instability and oil disruptions due to US-Iran tensions and Russian interference. China’s autocratic shift is occurring amid an economic slowdown and pandemic. Social unrest and internal tensions will flare. China will export uncertainty and stagflation. Inflation is causing disparate effects in South Asia – instability in Pakistan and Sri Lanka, and fiscal populism in India. Asset Initiation Date Return Long Brazilian Financials / Indian Equities (Closed) Feb 10/22 22.5% Bottom Line: Markets still face three geopolitical hurdles: Russian retaliation; Middle Eastern instability; Chinese uncertainty. Feature Global equities bounced back 6.1% from their trough on May 12 as investors cheered hints of weakening inflation and questioned the bearish consensus. BCA’s Global Investment Strategy correctly called the equity bounce. However, as BCA’s Geopolitical Strategy service, we see several sources of additional bad news. Throughout the Ukraine conflict we have highlighted two fundamental factors to ascertain regarding the ongoing macroeconomic impact: Will the war cut off the Russia-EU energy trade? Will the war broaden beyond Ukraine? Chart 1Russian-Exposed Assets Will Suffer More In this report we update our views on these two critical questions. The takeaway is that the geopolitical outlook is still flashing red. The US dollar will remain strong and currencies exposed to Russia and geopolitical risk will remain weak (Chart 1). In addition, China’s politics will continue to produce uncertainty and negative surprises this year. Taken together, investors should remain defensive for now but be ready to turn positive when the market clears the hurdles we identify. The fate of the business cycle hangs in the balance. Energy Ties Eroding … Russia Will Retaliate Over Oil Embargo Chart 2AEU Embargoes Russian Oil Europe is diversifying from Russian oil and natural gas. The European Union adopted a partial oil embargo on Russia that will cut oil imports by 90% by the end of 2022. It also removed Sberbank from the SWIFT banking communications network and slapped sanctions on companies that insure shipments of Russian crude. The sanctions will cut off all of Europe’s seaborne oil imports from Russia as well as major pipeline imports, except the Southern Druzhba pipeline. The EU made an exception for landlocked eastern European countries heavily dependent on Russian pipeline imports – namely Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Bulgaria (Chart 2A). Focus on the big picture. Germany changed its national policy to reduce Russian energy dependency for the sake of national security. From Chancellors Willy Brandt to Angela Merkel, Germany pursued energy cooperation and economic engagement as a means of lowering the risk of war with Russia. Ostpolitik worked in the Cold War, so when Russia seized Crimea in 2014, Merkel built the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. But Merkel’s policy failed to persuade Russia that economic cooperation is better than military confrontation – rather it emboldened President Putin, who viewed Europe as divided and corruptible. Chart 2BRussia Squeezes EU’s Natural Gas Russia’s regime is insecure and feels threatened by the US and NATO. Russia believed that if it invaded Ukraine, the Europeans would maintain energy relations for the sake of preserving overall strategic stability. Instead Germany and other European states began to view Russia as irrational and aggressive and hence a threat to their long-term security. They imposed a coal ban, now an oil ban the end of this year, and a natural gas ban by the end of 2027, all formalized under the recently announced RePowerEU program. Russia retaliated by declaring it would reduce natural gas exports to the Netherlands and probably Denmark, after having already cut off Finland, Poland, and Bulgaria (Chart 2B). As a pretext Russia points to its arbitrary March demand that states pay for gas in rubles rather than in currencies written in contracts. This ruble payment scheme is being enforced on a country-by-country basis against those Russia deems “unfriendly,” i.e. those that join NATO, adopt new sanctions, provide massive assistance to Ukraine, or are otherwise adverse. Chart 3Russia Actively Cutting Gas Flows Russia and Ukraine are already reducing natural gas exports through the Ukraine and Turkstream pipelines while the Yamal pipeline has been empty since May – and it is only a matter of time before flows begin to fall in the Nord Stream 1 pipeline to Germany (Chart 3). German government and industry are preparing to ration natural gas (to prioritize household needs) and revive 15 coal plants if necessary. Europe is attempting to rebuild stockpiles for the coming winter, when Russian willingness and capability to squeeze natural gas flows will reach a peak. The big picture is demonstrated by game theory in Diagram 1. The optimal situation for both Russia and the EU is to maintain energy exports for as long as possible, so that Russia has revenues to wage its war and Europe avoids a recession while transitioning away from Russian supplies (bottom right quadrant, each side receives four points). The problem is that this solution is not an equilibrium because either side can suffer a sudden shock if the other side betrays the tacit agreement and stops buying or selling (bottom left and top right quadrants). Diagram 1EU-Russia Standoff: What Does Game Theory Say? The equilibrium – the decision sets in which both Russia and the EU are guaranteed to lose the least – is a situation in which both states reduce energy trade immediately. Europe needs to cut off the revenues that fuel the Russian war machine while Russia needs to punish and deter Europe now while it still has massive energy leverage (top left quadrant, circled). Once Europe diversifies away, Russia loses its leverage. If Europe does not diversify immediately, Russia can punish it severely by cutting off energy before it is prepared. Russian energy weaponization is especially useful ahead of any ceasefire talks in Ukraine. Russia aims for Ukrainian military neutrality and a permanently weakened Ukrainian state. To that end it is seizing territory for the Luhansk and Donetsk People’s Republics, seizing the southern coastline and strategic buffer around Crimea, and controlling the mouth of the Dnieper river so that Ukraine is forever hobbled (Map 1). Once it achieves these aims it will want to settle a ceasefire that legitimizes its conquests. But Ukraine will wish to continue the fight. Map 1Russian Invasion Of Ukraine, 2022 Russia will need leverage over Europe to convince the EU to lean on Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire. Something similar occurred in 2014-15 when Russia collaborated with Germany and France to foist the Minsk Protocols onto Ukraine. If Russia keeps energy flowing to EU, the EU not only gets a smooth energy transition away from Russia but also gets to keep assisting Ukraine’s military effort. Whereas if Russia imposes pain on the EU ahead of ceasefire talks, the EU has greater interest in settling a ceasefire. Finally, given Russia’s difficulties on the battlefield, its loss of European patronage, and potential NATO enlargement on its borders, Moscow is highly likely to open a “new front” in its conflict with the West. Josef Stalin, for example, encouraged Kim Il Sung to invade South Korea in 1950. Today Russia’s options lie in the Middle East and North Africa – the regions where Europe turns for energy alternatives. Not only Libya and Algeria – which are both inherently fertile ground for Russia to sow instability – but also Iran and the broader Middle East, where a tenuous geopolitical balance is already eroding due to a lack of strategic understanding between the US and Iran. Russia’s capabilities are limited but it likely retains enough influence to ignite existing powder kegs in these areas. Bottom Line: Investors still face a few hurdles from the Ukraine war. First, the EU’s expanding energy embargo and Russian retaliation. Second, instability in the Middle East and North Africa. Hence energy price pressures will remain elevated in the short term and kill more demand, thus pushing the EU and the rest of the world toward stagflation or even recession. War Contained To Ukraine So Far … But Russia To Retaliate Over NATO Enlargement At present Russia is waging a full-scale assault on eastern and southern Ukraine, where about half of Donetsk awaits a decision (Map 2). If Russia emerges victorious over Donetsk in the summer or fall then it can declare victory and start negotiating a ceasefire. This timeline assumes that its economic circumstances are sufficiently straitened to prevent a campaign to the Moldovan border.1 Map 2Russia May Declare Victory If It Conquers The Rest Of Donetsk There are still ways for the Ukraine war to spill over into neighboring areas. For example, the Black Sea is effectively a Russian lake at the moment, which prevents Ukrainian grain from reaching global markets where food prices are soaring. Eventually the western maritime powers will need to attempt to restore freedom of navigation. However, Russia is imposing a blockade on Ukraine, has more at stake there than other powers, and can take greater risks. The US and its allies will continue to provide Ukraine with targeting information against Russian ships but this assistance could eventually provoke a larger naval conflict. Separately, the US has agreed to provide Ukraine with the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which could lead to attacks on Russian territory that would prompt a ferocious Russian reaction. Even assuming that the Ukraine war remains contained, Russia’s strategic conflict with the US and the West will remain unresolved and Moscow will be eager to save face. Russian retaliation will occur not only on account of European energy diversification but also on account of NATO enlargement. Finland and Sweden are attempting to join NATO and as such the West is directly repudiating the Putin regime’s chief strategic demand for 22 years. Finland shares an 830 mile border with Russia, adding insult to injury. The result will be another round of larger military tensions that go beyond Ukraine and prolong this year’s geopolitical risk and uncertainty. Russia’s initial response to Finland’s and Sweden’s joint application to NATO was to dismiss the threat they pose while drawing a new red line. Rather than forbidding NATO enlargement, Russia now demands that no NATO forces be deployed to these two states. This demand, which Putin and other officials expressed, may or may not amount to a genuine Russian policy change. Russia’s initial responses should be taken with a grain of salt because Turkey is temporarily blocking Finland’s and Sweden’s applications, so Russia has no need to respond to NATO enlargement yet. But the true test will come when and if the West satisfies Turkey’s grievances and Turkey moves to admit the new members. If enlargement becomes inevitable, Russia will respond. Russia will feel that its national security is fundamentally jeopardized by Sweden overturning two centuries of neutrality and Finland reversing the policy of “Finlandization” that went so far in preventing conflict during the Cold War. Chart 4Military Balances Stacking Up Against Russia Russia’s military options are limited. Russia has little ability to expand the war and fight on multiple fronts judging by the army’s recent performance in Ukraine and the Red Army’s performance in the Winter War of 1939. This point can be illustrated by taking the military balance of Russia and its most immediate adversaries, which add up to about half of Russian military strength even apart from NATO (Chart 4). Russian armed forces already demonstrated some pragmatism in April by withdrawing from Kyiv and focusing on more achievable war aims. Unless President Putin turns utterly reckless and the Russian state fails to restrain him, Russia will opt for defensive measures and strategic deterrence rather than a military offensive in the Baltics. Hence Russia’s military response will come in the form of threats rather than outright belligerence. However, these threats will probably include military and nuclear actions that will raise alarm bells across Europe and the United States. President Dmitri Medvedev has already warned of the permanent deployment of nuclear missiles in the Kaliningrad exclave.2 This statement points to only the most symbolic option of a range of options that will increase deterrence and elevate the fear of war. Otherwise Russia’s retaliation will consist of squeezing global energy supply, as discussed above, including by opening a new front in the Middle East and North Africa. Instability should be expected as a way of constraining Europe and distracting America. Higher energy prices may or may not convince the EU to negotiate better terms with Russia but they will sow divisions within and among the allies. Ultimately Russia is highly unlikely to sacrifice its credibility by failing to retaliate for the combination of energy embargo and NATO enlargement on its borders. Since its military options are becoming constrained (at least its rational ones), its economic and asymmetrical options will grow in importance. The result will be additional energy supply constraints. Bottom Line: Even assuming that the war does not spread beyond Ukraine – likely but not certain – global financial markets face at least one more period of military escalation with Russia. This will likely include significant energy cutoffs and saber-rattling – even nuclear threats – over NATO enlargement. China’s Political Situation Has Not Normalized China continues to suffer from a historic confluence of internal and external political risk that will cause negative surprises for investors. Temporary improvements in government policy or investor sentiment – centered on a relaxation of “Zero Covid” lockdowns in major cities and a more dovish regulatory tone against the tech giants – will likely be frustrated, at least until after a more dovish government stance can be confirmed in the wake of the twentieth national party congress in October or November this year. At that event, Chinese President Xi Jinping is likely to clinch another ten years in power and complete the transformation of China’s governance from single-party rule to single-person rule. This reversion to autocracy will generate additional market-negative developments this year. It has already embedded a permanently higher risk premium in Chinese financial assets because it increases the odds of policy mistakes, international aggression, and ultimately succession crisis. The most successful Asian states chose to democratize and expand free markets and capitalism when they reached a similar point of economic development and faced the associated sociopolitical challenges. But China is choosing the opposite path for the sake of national security. Investors have seen the decay of Russia’s economy under Putin’s autocracy and would be remiss not to upgrade the odds of similarly negative outcomes in China over the long run as a result of Xi’s autocracy, despite the many differences between the two countries. China’s situation is more difficult than that of the democratic Asian states because of its reviving strategic rivalry with the United States. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently unveiled President Biden’s comprehensive China policy. He affirmed that the administration views China as the US’s top strategic competitor over the long run, despite the heightened confrontation with Russia.3 The Biden administration has not eased the Trump administration’s tariffs or punitive measures on China. It is unlikely to do so during a midterm election year when protectionist dynamics prevail – especially given that the Xi administration will be in the process of reestablishing autocracy, and possibly repressing social unrest, at the very moment Americans go to the polls. Re-engagement with China is also prohibited because China is strengthening its strategic bonds with Russia. President Biden has repeatedly implied that the US would defend Taiwan in any conflict with China. These statements are presented as gaffes or mistakes but they are in fact in keeping with historical US military actions threatening counter-attack during the three historic Taiwan Strait crises. The White House quickly walks back these comments to reassure China that the US does not support Taiwanese independence or intend to trigger a war with China. The result is that the US is using Biden’s gaffe-prone personality to reemphasize the hard edge (rather than the soft edge) of the US’s policy of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan. US policy is still ambiguous but ambiguity includes the possibility that a president might order military action to defend Taiwan. US attempts to increase deterrence and avoid a Ukraine scenario are threatening for China, which will view the US as altering the status quo and penalizing China for Russia’s actions. Beijing resumed overflights of Taiwan’s air defense identification zone in the wake of Biden’s remarks as well as the decision of the US to send Senator Tammy Duckworth to Taiwan to discuss deeper economic and defense ties. Consider the positioning of US aircraft carrier strike groups as an indicator of the high level of strategic tensions. On January 18, 2022, as Russia amassed military forces on the Ukrainian border – and the US and NATO rejected its strategic demands – the US had only one publicly acknowledged aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean (the USS Harry Truman) whereas it had at least five US carriers in East Asia. On February 24, the day of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the US had at least four of these carriers in Asia. Even today the US has at least four carriers in the Pacific compared to at least two in Europe – one of which, notably, is in the Baltics to deter Russia from attacking Finland and Sweden (Map 3). The US is warning China not to take advantage of the Ukraine war by staging a surprise attack on Taiwan. Map 3Amid Ukraine War, US Deters China From Attacking Taiwan Of course, strategic tensions are perennial, whereas what investors are most concerned about is whether China can secure its economic recovery. The latest data are still disappointing. Credit growth continues to falter as the private sector struggles with a deteriorating demographic and macroeconomic outlook (Chart 5). The credit impulse has entered positive territory, when local government bonds are included, reflecting government stimulus efforts. But it is still negative when excluding local governments. And even the positive measure is unimpressive, having ticked back down in April (Chart 6). Chart 5Credit Growth Falters Amid Economic Transition Chart 6Silver Lining: Credit Impulse Less Negative Bottom Line: Further monetary and fiscal easing will come in China, a source of good news for global investors next year if coupled with a broader policy shift in favor of business, but the effects will be mixed this year due to Covid policy and domestic politics. Taken together with a European energy crunch and Middle Eastern oil supply disruptions, China’s stimulus is not a catalyst for a sustainable global equity market rally this year. South Asia: Inflation Hammers Sri Lanka And Pakistan Since 2020 we have argued that the global pandemic would result in a new wave of supply pressures and global social unrest. High inflation is blazing a trail of destruction in emerging markets, notably in South Asia, where per capita incomes are low and political institutions often fragile. Chart 7South Asia: Surging Inflation Sri Lanka has been worst affected (Chart 7). Inflation surged to an eye-watering 34% in April and is expected to rise further. Surging inflation has affected Sri Lanka disproportionately because its macroeconomic and political fundamentals were weak to begin with. The tourism-dependent Sri Lankan economy suffered a body blow from terrorist attacks in 2019 and the pandemic in 2020-21. Then 2022 saw a power struggle between Sri Lanka’s President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and members of the national assembly including Prime Minister (PM) Mahinda Rajapaksa. The crisis hit a crescendo when the country defaulted on external debt obligations last month. These events weigh on Sri Lanka’s ability to transition from a long civil war (1983-2009) to a path of sustained economic development. While the political crisis has seemingly stabilized following the appointment of new Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, we remain bearish on a strategic time horizon. This is mainly because the new PM is unlikely to bring about structural solutions for Sri Lanka’s broken economy. Moreover, Sri Lanka holds more than $50 billion of foreign debt, or 62% of GDP. Another country that has been dealing with political instability alongside high inflation in South Asia is Pakistan, where inflation hit a three-year high in April (see Chart 7 above). The latest twist in Pakistan’s never-ending cycle of political uncertainty comes from the ousted Prime Minister Imran Khan. The former PM, who commands an unusual popular support group due to his fame as a cricketer prior to entering politics, is demanding fresh elections and otherwise threatening to hold mass protests. Pakistan’s new coalition government and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who came to power amid parliamentary intrigues, are refusing elections and ultimatums. From a structural perspective Pakistan is characterized by a weak economy and an unusually influential military. Now it faces high inflation and rising food prices – indeed it is one of the countries that is most dangerously exposed to the Russia-Ukraine war as it depends on these two for over 70% of its grain imports. Bottom Line: MSCI Sri Lanka has underperformed the MSCI EM index by 58.3% this year to date. Pakistan has underperformed the same index by 41.6% over the same period. Against this backdrop, we remain strategic sellers of both bourses. Instability in these countries is also one of the factors behind our strategic assessment of India as a country with a growing domestic policy consensus. South Asia: India’s Fiscal Populism And Geopolitics Inflation is less rampant in India, although still troublesome. Consumer prices nearly jumped to an 8-year high in April (see Chart 7). With a loaded state election calendar due over the next 12-18 months, the jump in inflation naturally triggered a series of mitigating policy responses. Ban On Wheat Exports: India produces 14% of the world’s wheat and 11% of grains, and exports 5% and 7%, respectively. India’s exports could make a large profit in the context of global shortages. But Prime Minister Narendra Modi is entering into the political end of the business cycle, with key state elections due that will have an impact on the ruling party’s political standing two years before the next federal election. He fears political vulnerability if exports continue amid price pressures at home. The emphasis on food security is typical but also bespeaks a lack of commitment to economic reform. Chart 8India's Real Interest Rates Fall Surprise Rate Hikes: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) increased the policy repo rate by 40 basis points at an unscheduled meeting on May 4, thereby implementing its first rate hike since August 2018. With real rates in India lower than those in China or Brazil (Chart 8), the RBI will be forced to expedite its planned rate hikes through 2022. Tax Cuts On Fuel: India’s central government also announced steep cuts in excise duty on fuel. This is another populist measure that reduces political pressures but fails to encourage the private sector to adjust. These measures will help rein in inflation but the rate hikes will weigh on economic growth while the tax cuts will add to India’s fiscal deficit. Indeed, India is resorting to fiscal populism with key state elections looming. Geopolitical risk is less of a concern for India – indeed the Ukraine war has strengthened its bargaining position. In the short run, India benefits from the ability to buy arms and especially cheap oil from Russia while the EU imposes an embargo. But over the long run its economy and security can be strengthened by greater interest from the US and its allies, recently highlighted by the fourth meeting of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) and the launch of the US’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF). These initiatives are modest but they highlight the US’s need to replace China with India and ASEAN over time, a trend that no US administration can reverse now because of the emerging Russo-Chinese strategic alliance. At the same time, the Quad underscores India’s maritime interests and hence the security benefits India can gain from aligning its economy and navy with the other democracies. Bottom Line: Fiscal populism in the context of high commodity prices is negative for Indian equities. However, our views on Russia, the Middle East, and China all point to a sharper short-term spike in commodity prices that ultimately drives the world economy deeper into stagflation or recession. Therefore we are booking a 22.5% profit on our tactical decision to go long Brazilian financials relative to Indian equities. Matt Gertken Chief Geopolitical Strategist mattg@bcaresearch.com Ritika Mankar, CFA Editor/Strategist ritika.mankar@bcaresearch.com Chart 9Russia: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 10Other Measures Of Russian Geopolitical Risk Chart 11China: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 12United Kingdom: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 13Germany: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 14France: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 15Italy: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 16Canada: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 17Spain: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 18Australia: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 19Taiwan: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 20Korea: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 21Turkey: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 22South Africa: GeoRisk Indicator Chart 23Brazil: GeoRisk Indicator Footnotes 1 Recent diplomatic flaps between core European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reflect Ukraine’s fear that Europe will negotiate a “separate peace” with Russia, i.e. accept Russian territorial conquests in exchange for economic relief. 2 Dmitri Medvedev explicitly states ‘there can be no more talk of any nuclear-free status for the Baltic - the balance must be restored’ in warning Finland and Sweden joining NATO. Medvedev is suggesting that nuclear weapons will be placed in this area where Russia has its Kaliningrad exclave sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania. Guy Faulconbridge, ‘Russia warns of nuclear, hypersonic deployment if Sweden and Finland join NATO’, April 14, 2022, Reuters. 3 See Antony J Blinken, Secretary of State, ‘The Administration’s Approach to the People’s Republic of China’, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., May 26, 2022, state.gov. Additionally, see President Joe Biden’s remarks on China and getting involved military to defend Taiwan in a joint press conference with Japan’s Prime Minister Kishida Fumio. ‘Remarks by President Biden and Prime Minister Kishida Fumio of Japan in Joint Press Conference’, Akasaka Palace, Tokyo, Japan, May 23, 2022, whitehouse.gov. Strategic Themes Open Tactical Positions (0-6 Months) Open Cyclical Recommendations (6-18 Months) Regional Geopolitical Risk Matrix Section III: Geopolitical Calendar
Inflationary pressures appear to be intensifying in the Indian economy. Wholesale prices soared by 15.08% in April – the fastest pace since September 1991. Similarly, at 7.79%, CPI inflation exceeds the 6% upper band of the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI)…
Executive Summary India’s annual consumer price inflation will rise a notch from current levels but is unlikely to surpass 8% in a sustained manner. Demand-driven price pressures are absent in the Indian economy. So are wage pressures. That leaves commodity prices as the sole source of inflation. Global industrial commodity prices dictate India’s producer price inflation, but not consumer price inflation. The latter is determined by domestic factors. Higher import costs on fertilizer and edible oils will push up India’s food inflation a bit, but food inflation is mainly affected by the ‘Minimum Support Price’ that the government pays to farmers for food procurement. The central bank is making a policy mistake by raising interest rates to suppress commodity price-driven inflation when domestic demand is quite weak. The Indian profit outlook has deteriorated meaningfully due to falling margins. Higher interest rates will add to the headwinds. This bourse is also very expensive relative to its EM peers. India: Consumer Price Inflation Is A Function Of Broad Money Supply Bottom Line: Absolute return investors should avoid this bourse. Asset allocators should stay underweight India in EM and Emerging Asian equity portfolios. Bond investors should stay neutral India in EM and Emerging Asian domestic bond portfolios. Feature In much of the developed world, inflation has risen to 40-year highs. Inflation has surged in many developing countries as well. India has been one major exception in the latter group − where both headline and core consumer inflation have remained rangebound so far (Chart 1). The question is, if and for how long will India be able to buck the tide of higher global inflation? On a related note, what would be the likely effects of higher inflation on Indian markets? We believe headline and core CPI in India will rise from the current levels of around 6.5%; but will not go past 8% on a sustainable basis. This is much below the double digit levels the country often witnessed in the 1990s and 2000s. The main reason behind our optimism is that demand-driven price pressures are absent in the current cycle. The sole source of inflation is higher global commodity prices, which could be peaking on a rate of change basis. The commodity-led nature of inflation in India also makes monetary policy a less effective tool to control it in this cycle. In fact, considerable monetary tightening will be a policy error as it could nip the already weak domestic demand in the bud. We turned bearish on Indian stocks in March this year, and believe they have more downside in absolute terms. Their recent relative outperformance will also fizzle out sooner rather than later, as this was partially due to investors forsaking the Chinese market. This caused a sharp fall in the latter boosting other bourses’ relative performances (Chart 2). Chart 1India Has So far Been An Exception To The Global Trend Of Surging Inflation Chart 2Indian Stocks Will Weaken More And Underperform EM Investors would therefore do well to stay underweight Indian stocks in EM and Emerging Asian equity portfolios for now. Local currency bond investors should stay neutral India in the respective EM and Emerging Asian bond portfolios. Why Has Inflation Stayed Downbeat? Just like in other economies, labor productivity trends set the tone of India’s structural inflation backdrop. Up until the early 2000s, India’s average productivity gains used to be rather low: of the order of 3% annually. Thereafter, a surge in capital spending on infrastructure and other productive capacity propelled India’s average annual productivity growth rate to twice as high. This has helped improve India’s structural inflation backdrop considerably. That said, over a cyclical horizon, it is the ebbs and flows of broad money supply (M3) that determines India’s consumer inflation trajectory (Chart 3). Chart 3India: Consumer Price Inflation Is A Function Of Broad Money Supply Chart 4Money Supply Will Stay Tame As Its Sources Are Rather Muted Broad money supply in India has decelerated over the past year and a half. This is in sharp contrast to most developed economies and many emerging economies in Latin America and EMEA; and it is the main reason why inflation prints have diverged between those countries and India. In the foreseeable future, there is little indication that India’s broad money supply will accelerate by any meaningful measure. This is because the major sources of money creation – bank credit origination and the central bank and commercial banks’ purchases of non-bank securities − have all remained rather muted in the recent past. Bank credit has grown only at a 7% nominal annualized rate over the past three years. In real terms (deflated by headline CPI), they have barely risen. Commercial banks’ purchases of government bonds are growing at only 5%. The central bank’s monetization of government debt, the other source of money creation, has also decelerated since early 2020 (Chart 4). The decelerating broad money supply means the odds of a demand-driven surge in consumer price inflation is also quite low. What About Commodity-Led Inflation? Elevated commodity prices have pushed up India’s consumer price inflation by a notch. Yet, given that much of the rally in global industrial commodities is probably already behind us, it’s effect on future inflation in India will likely be limited: Global industrial commodity prices drive India’s producer price inflation1 (PPI). But the correlation with India’s consumer price inflation is only tenuous (Chart 5). Moreover, given that India’s PPI tracks global commodity prices with a few months lag, this is also set to decelerate in the coming months. Consistently, the pass-through effect from high global crude prices to local gasoline and diesel prices in India has also rolled over on a rate of change basis (Chart 6, top panel). Chart 5Global Commodity Prices Dictate India's Producer Prices, But Not Consumer Prices Chart 6Domestic Fuel Price Inflation Is Much Lower Than Crude Price Would Suggest Notably, Indian authorities did not reduce local gasoline and diesel prices back in 2020-21 when global crude prices had slumped. Hence, the incremental rise in local fuel prices in the past several months has not been as steep as they might have been (Chart 6, bottom panel). As a result, energy-related inflation prints in India are not as high as crude oil prices would suggest. In fact, CPI for Fuel & Light and Transport & Communication2 have both decelerated from 12%+ YoY rate to 8% and are slowing further. That means the pass-through from higher fuel prices to the rest of the economy going forward will also be receding. Fertilizer (mostly potash) and edible oil3 are the two other major commodities that India imports. The import bill of these two items has almost doubled in dollar as well as in rupee terms in the past year due to surging prices globally. Together, they now account for 5% of India’s total imports. Higher import costs of these items will lead to slightly higher food prices in future. That said, India’s food inflation moves more with the “Minimum Support Price” (MSP). This is the price that the government pays to farmers for procuring various food grains every year (Chart 7, top panel). Since the government is by far the single largest purchaser, the price it pays sets the floor in the market. In recent years, authorities did not hike procurement prices by much. Unless authorities announce a much higher MSP for the current year, both food and headline CPI will likely stay under control. Finally, India is largely self-reliant when it comes to food. The buffer stock of the country’s food grains, currently at 74 million tons, far exceeds the estimated requirements (Chart 8). Short of any logistics debacle therefore, it’s hard to imagine that food prices could soar sustainably. Chart 7The Government's Support Prices Have A strong Bearing On Food Inflation And Rural Wages Chart 8India's Buffer Stock Of Food Grains Is Quite Robust All that said, food inflation is the main risk on India’s inflation horizon. The reason for that is rising food prices often unmoor household inflation expectations, and eventually lead to higher realized inflation. Chart 9 shows that higher food prices in India do leak into non-food prices, albeit to a limited extent. As such, marginally higher food prices owing to higher import costs of fertilizer and edible oils will see India’s core inflation also rise a bit. Chart 9Higher Food Inflation Leaks Into Core Inflation, But Only So Much How High Can Core CPI Rise? As discussed, India’s core inflation will likely remain mostly under control. A crucial reason for that is wage pressures are absent in India. This is in stark contrast to the US, where high wage pressures are threatening to morph into a wage-inflation spiral. In rural India, both farm and non-farm nominal wages have been growing at an average sub-5% rate since 2016, which is below CPI inflation. One reason rural wages have stayed low is that authorities have not raised the MSP much in recent years. A lower MSP not only reins in food prices, but it also keeps a tab on wages (Chart 7, bottom panel). As such, unless the government decides to raise the MSP meaningfully this year, it will be difficult for rural wages to rise materially. On the urban side, the RBI survey on expectations for industrial salary and remunerations also depicts a similarly subdued outlook (Chart 10). Going forward, as tens of millions of young people continue to join the workforce every year, the broader wage picture in India is unlikely to change much. Subdued wage pressures will help keep a tab on the general inflationary pressures in the economy. On its own, India’s core CPI (i.e., CPI ex-food and ex-fuel) is largely a function of domestic money and credit trends. Global crude oil prices also matter to some extent. However, as discussed above, few of these variables are accelerating sharply. That means odds are low that core CPI will rise much more from the current levels. Indeed, our in-house model for core CPI, based on the variables just mentioned, points to a rather benign outlook (Chart 11). Chart 10Wage Pressures Are Absent, Entailing Core Inflation Will Stay Under Control Chart 11India's Inflation Outlook Is Sanguine Does Inflation Hurt Indian Stocks? The primary drivers of Indian stocks are economic growth and corporate profits. Stock prices do not usually get hurt as long as CPI stays in low and mid-single digits. However, once CPI breaches the 8% mark sustainably, stocks typically sell off (Chart 12). Chart 12Indian Stocks Face Major Headwinds When CPI Breaches The 8% Mark Chart 13Indian Stocks Have A Positive Correlation With PPI, As Both Benefit From Global Growth The reason is that when inflation is sustainably high, meaningful monetary tightening ensues. Higher interest rates make it costlier to borrow for either consumption or investment purposes, and therefore depresses demand in the economy. That leads to a squeeze in profit margins, which in turn weighs on equity multiples and thus equity prices. Interestingly, unlike CPI, which has no stable correlation with Indian stock prices, PPI has a robust positive correlation with stocks. The link is via corporate earnings. Indian PPI tracks the ebbs and flows in global commodity prices, and therefore global growth. Strong global growth boosts all corporate earnings, including that of India. Accelerating PPI is therefore a harbinger of higher Indian earnings and stock prices. Going forward, however, a decelerating PPI is pointing to lower stock prices in India (Chart 13). Is RBI Making A Policy Mistake? India’s central bank seems to be committing a policy mistake by raising interest rates to suppress commodity price-driven inflation when domestic demand is already very weak. This is negative for the economy and share prices. Chart 14Household Consumption Is Quite Weak; Domestic Production Is Far Below Trend The Reserve Bank of India surprised the market last week by raising policy rates by 40 basis points to 4.4%. They also raised commercial banks’ cash reserve ratio by 50 basis points to 4.5% in order to tighten banking sector liquidity. Monetary tightening, as a policy tool, works by stifling domestic demand. It makes borrowing for the purpose of investments and consumption more costly. It is, however, rather ineffective in resolving inflation caused by higher food and fuel prices – as is the case in India presently. Notably, high commodity inflation itself forces consumers to spend a lower amount on other core items – leading to weaker demand for the latter. Further monetary tightening would exacerbate that weakness. As explained before, Indian consumer prices are driven mostly by domestic factors, such as money supply and productivity (Chart 3, above), rather than global commodity prices. This distinction is important given that the central bank’s mandate is to manage CPI, not PPI. As such, monetary policy should ideally be based on mostly domestic dynamics. India’s domestic demand is extremely soft compared to the US where inflation has skyrocketed. Given the massive negative output gap that opened up in the Indian economy during the pandemic-related lockdowns, it will take a while before this economy sees genuine, sustained overheating. In view of this softness, any meaningful hike in interest rates (say another 100 basis points) could have a material negative impact on the recovery, and by extension, on stock prices: Household consumption is quite weak − as is evident in local car and 2-wheeler sales (Chart 14, top panel). One reason for that is the subdued wage growth mentioned above. Pandemic-era fiscal stimulus, at less than 2% of GDP, has not been nearly enough to compensate for lost household income during the lockdowns. Consistent with lackluster household demand, manufacturing and other industrial productions are also languishing at far below the pre-pandemic trend (Chart 14, bottom panel). Robust capex is what spearheaded India’s post-pandemic recovery. But, now with decelerating corporate profits, capital investments have begun to slow. Higher costs of borrowing will further discourage capex plans. If so, lower investments will do more than shave off GDP growth in the coming quarters. If continued, this could be a major risk for India’s sustainable growth story, and its ill-effects may linger. Chart 15Higher Interest Rates Are A Headwind For Stock Prices All in all, given the nature of inflation in India in the current cycle, it will be a mistake to raise policy rates by any meaningful measure. Both consumption and investments will be hurt. Stock prices, which clearly benefit from lower interest rates, will be facing higher rates, and will therefore sell off (Chart 15). As such, it will be difficult for the RBI to continue to tighten monetary policy without causing a significant bear market in Indian stocks. Investment Conclusions Equities: The Indian profit outlook has deteriorated meaningfully as a result of falling margins and an impending growth slowdown. This bourse is also very expensive relative to its EM peers. Higher interest rates will add to the headwinds. Absolute return investors should avoid this market. Asset allocators should stay underweight in EM and Emerging Asian equity portfolios. Currency And Bonds: The Indian rupee could depreciate marginally along with a likely sell-off in Indian stocks. Given that higher interest rates will likely be detrimental to a growth recovery, it will discourage capital inflows, and will therefore be negative for the rupee. As the rupee could be weaker, and bond yields could rise marginally with tighter banking sector liquidity, investors should stay neutral on India in EM and Emerging Asian bond portfolios. Rajeeb Pramanik Senior EM Strategist rajeeb.pramanik@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Also called ‘wholesale prices.’ 2 CPI for Fuel & Light has a 6.8% weight in the CPI basket. Transportation & Communication has 8.6% weight. 3 Edible oil has a weight of 3.6% in India’s CPI basket.