Sectors
Listen to a short summary of this report. Executive Summary The US Inflation Surprise Index Has Rolled Over Global equities are nearing a bottom and will rally over the coming months as inflation declines and growth reaccelerates. While equity valuations are not at bombed-out levels, they have cheapened significantly. Global stocks trade at 15.3-times forward earnings. We are upgrading tech stocks from underweight to neutral. The NASDAQ Composite now trades at a forward P/E of 22.6, down from 32.9 at its peak last year. The 10-year Treasury yield should decline to 2.5% by the end of the year, which will help tech stocks at the margin. The US dollar has peaked. A weakening dollar will provide a tailwind to stocks, especially overseas bourses. US high-yield spreads are pricing in a default rate of 6.2% over the next 12 months, well above the trailing default rate of 1.2%. Favor high-yield credit over government bonds within a fixed-income portfolio. Bottom Line: The recent sell-off in stocks provides a good opportunity to increase equity allocations. We expect global stocks to rise 15%-to-20% over the next 12 months. Back to Bullish We wrote a report on April 22nd arguing that global equities were heading towards a “last hurrah” in the second half of the year as a Goldilocks environment of falling inflation and supply-side led growth emerges. Last week, we operationalized this view by tactically upgrading stocks to overweight after having downgraded them in late February. This highly out-of-consensus view change, coming at a time when surveys by the American Association of Individual Investors and other outfits show extreme levels of bearishness, has garnered a lot of attention. In this week’s report, we answer some of the most common questions from the perspective of a skeptical reader. Q: Inflation is at multi-decade highs, global growth is faltering, and central banks are about to hike rates faster than we have seen in years. Isn’t it too early to turn bullish? A: We need to focus on how the world will look like in six months, not how it looks like now. Inflation has likely peaked and many of the forces that have slowed growth, such as China’s Covid lockdown and the war in Ukraine, could abate. Q: What is the evidence that inflation has peaked? And may I remind you, even if inflation does decline later this year, this is something that most investors and central banks are already banking on. Inflation would need to fall by more than expected for your bullish scenario to play out. A: That’s true, but there is good reason to think that this is precisely what will happen. Overall spending in the US is close to its pre-pandemic trend. However, spending on goods remains above trend while spending on services is below trend (Chart 1). Services prices tend to be stickier than goods prices. Thus, the shift in spending patterns caused goods inflation to rise markedly with little offsetting decline in services inflation. To cite one of many examples, fitness equipment prices rose dramatically, but gym membership fees barely fell (Chart 2). Chart 1Total US Consumer Spending Is Almost Exactly At Its Pre-Pandemic Trend, But The Composition Of Spending Remains Skewed Chart 2Asymmetries Matter: Firms Manufacturing Sports Equipment Jacked Up Prices, But Gyms Barely Cut Prices As goods demand normalizes, goods inflation will come down. Meanwhile, the supply of goods should increase as the pandemic winds down, and hopefully, a detente is reached in Ukraine. There are already indications that some supply-chain bottlenecks have eased (Chart 3). Q: Even if supply shocks abate, which seems like a BIG IF to me, wouldn’t the shift in spending towards services supercharge what has been only a modest acceleration in services inflation so far? A: Wages are the most important driver of services inflation. Although the evidence is still tentative, it does appear as though wage inflation is peaking. The 3-month annualized growth rate in average hourly earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers slowed from 7.2% in the second half of 2021 to 3.8% in April (Chart 4). Assuming productivity growth of 1.5%, this is consistent with unit labor cost inflation of only slightly more than 2%, which is broadly consistent with the Fed’s CPI inflation target.1 Chart 4Wage Pressures May Be Starting To Ease Moreover, a smaller proportion of firms expect to raise wages over the next six months than was the case late last year according to a variety of regional Fed surveys (Chart 5). The same message is echoed by the NFIB small business survey (Chart 6). Consistent with all this, the US Citi Inflation Surprise Index has rolled over (Chart 7). Chart 6... Small Business Owners Included Chart 7The US Inflation Surprise Index Has Rolled Over Q: What about the “too cold” risk to your Goldilocks scenario? The risks of recession seem to be rising. A: The market is certainly worried about this outcome, and that has been the main reason stocks have fallen of late. However, we do not think this fear is justified, certainly not in the US (Chart 8). US households are sitting on $2.3 trillion excess savings, equal to about 14% of annual consumption. The ratio of household debt-to-disposable income is down 36 percentage points from its highs in early 2008, giving households the wherewithal to spend more. Core capital goods orders, a good leading indicator for capex, have surged. The homeowner vacancy rate is at a record low, suggesting that homebuilding will be fairly resilient in the face of higher mortgage rates. Q: It seems like the Fed has a nearly impossible task on its hands: Increase labor market slack by enough to cool the economy but not so much as to trigger a recession. You yourself have pointed out that the Fed has never achieved this in its history. A: It is correct that the unemployment rate has never risen by more than one-third of a percentage point in the US without a recession occurring (Chart 9). That said, there are three reasons to think that a soft landing can be achieved this time. Chart 9When Unemployment Starts Rising, It Usually Keeps Rising First, increasing labor market slack is easier if one can raise labor supply rather than reducing labor demand. Right now, the participation rate is nearly a percentage point below where it was in 2019, even if one adjusts for increased early retirement during the pandemic (Chart 10). Wages have risen relatively more at the bottom end of the income distribution. This should draw more low-wage workers into the labor force. Furthermore, according to the Federal Reserve, accumulated bank savings for the lowest-paid 20% of workers have been shrinking since last summer, which should incentivize job seeking (Chart 11). Chart 10Labor Participation Has Further Scope To Recover Chart 11Depleted Savings Will Force More Lower-Wage Workers Into The Labor Market Second, long-term inflation expectations remain well contained, which makes a soft landing more likely. Median expected inflation 5-to-10 years out in the University of Michigan survey stood at 3% in May, roughly where it was between 2005 and 2013 (Chart 12). Median expected earnings growth in the New York Fed Survey of Consumer Expectations was only slightly higher in April than it was prior to the pandemic (Chart 13). Chart 12Consumer Long-Term Inflation Expectations Have Risen But Remain Relatively Low Chart 13US Consumers Do Not Expect Wages To Grow At A Much Higher Rate Than In The Pre-Pandemic Period A third reason for thinking that a soft landing may be easier to achieve this time around is that the US private-sector financial balance – the difference between what the private sector earns and spends – is still in surplus (Chart 14). This stands in contrast to the lead-up to both the 2001 and 2008-09 recessions, when the private sector was living beyond its means. Q: You have spoken a lot about the US, but the situation seems dire elsewhere. Europe may already be in recession as we speak! A: The near-term outlook for Europe is indeed challenging. The euro area economy grew by only 0.8% annualized in the first quarter. Mathieu Savary, BCA’s Chief European Strategist, expects an outright decline in output in Q2. To no one’s surprise, the war in Ukraine is weighing on European growth. The Bundesbank estimates that a full embargo of Russian oil and gas would reduce German real GDP by an additional 5% on top of the damage already inflicted by the war (Chart 15). Chart 14The US Private-Sector Financial Balance Remains In Surplus Chart 15Germany’s Economy Will Sink Without Russian Energy While such a full embargo is possible, it is not our base case. In a remarkable about-face, Putin now says he has “no problems” with Finland and Sweden joining NATO, provided that they do not place military infrastructure in their countries. He had previous threatened a military response at the mere suggestion of NATO membership. In any case, there are few signs that Putin’s increasingly insular and dictatorial regime would respond to an oil embargo or other economic incentives. The wealthy oligarchs who were supposed to rein him in are cowering in fear. It is also not clear if Europe would gain any political leverage over Russia by adopting policies that push its own economy into a recession. It is worth noting that the price of the December 2022 European natural gas futures contract is down 39% from its peak at the start of the war (Chart 16). It is also noteworthy that European EPS estimates have been trending higher this year even as GDP growth estimates have been cut (Chart 17). This suggests that the analyst earnings projections were too conservative going into the year. Chart 16European Natural Gas Futures Are High But Below Their Peak Chart 17European And US EPS Estimates Have Been Trending Higher This Year Chart 18Chinese Property Sector: Signs Of Contraction Q: What about China? The lockdowns are crippling growth and the property market is in shambles. A: There is truth to both those claims. The government has all but said that it will not abandon its zero-Covid policy anytime soon, even going as far as to withdraw from hosting the 2023 AFC Asian Cup. While the number of new cases has declined sharply in Shanghai, future outbreaks are probable. On the bright side, China is likely to ramp up domestic production of Pfizer’s Paxlovid drug. Increased availability of the drug will reduce the burden of the disease once social distancing restrictions are relaxed. As far as the property market is concerned, sales, starts, completions, as well as home prices are all contracting (Chart 18). BCA’s China Investment Strategy expects accelerated policy easing to put the housing sector on a recovery path in the second half of this year. Nevertheless, they expect the “three red lines” policy to remain in place, suggesting that the rebound in housing activity will be more muted than in past recoveries.2 Ironically, the slowdown in the Chinese housing market may not be such a bad thing for the rest of the world. Remember, the main problem these days is inflation. To the extent that a sluggish Chinese housing market curbs the demand for commodities, this could provide some relief on the inflation front. Q: So bad news is good news. Interesting take. Let’s turn to markets. You mentioned earlier that equity sentiment was very bearish. Fair enough, but I would note the very same American Association of Individual Investors survey that you cited also shows that investors’ allocation to stocks is near record highs (Chart 19). Shouldn’t we look at what investors are doing rather than what they’re saying? A: The discrepancy may not be as large as it seems. As Chart 20 illustrates, investors may not like stocks, but they like bonds even less. Chart 19Individual Investors Still Hold A Lot Of Stock Chart 20B... But They Like Bonds Even Less Chart 21Global Equities Are More Attractively Valued After The Recent Sell-Off Global equities currently trade at 15.3-times forward earnings; a mere 12.5-times outside the US. The global forward earnings yield is 6.7 percentage points higher than the global real bond yield. In 2000, the spread between the earnings yield and the real bond yield was close to zero (Chart 21). It should also be mentioned that institutional data already show a sharp shift out of equities. The latest Bank of America survey revealed that fund managers cut equity allocations to a net 13% underweight in May from a 6% overweight in April and a net 55% overweight in January. Strikingly, fund managers were even more underweight bonds than stocks. Cash registered the biggest overweight in two decades. Q: Your bullish equity bias notwithstanding, you were negative on tech stocks last year, arguing that the NASDAQ would turn into the NASDOG. Given that the NASDAQ Composite is down 29% from its highs, is it time to increase exposure to some beaten down tech names? A: Both the cyclical and structural headwinds facing tech stocks that we discussed in These Three High-Flying Equity Sectors Could Come Crashing Back Down To Earth and The Disruptor Delusion remain in place. Nevertheless, with the NASDAQ Composite now trading at 22.6-times forward earnings, down from 32.9 at its peak last year, an underweight in tech is no longer appropriate (Chart 22). A neutral stance is now preferable. Chart 22Tech Stock Valuations Have Returned To Earth Q: I guess if bond yields come down a bit more, that would help tech stocks? A: Yes. Tech stocks tend to be growth-oriented. Falling bond yields raise the present value of expected cash flows more for growth companies than for other firms. While we do expect global bond yields to eventually rise above current levels, yields are likely to decline modestly over the next 12 months as inflation temporarily falls. We expect the US 10-year yield to end the year at around 2.5%. Q: A decline in US bond yields would undermine the high-flying dollar, would it not? A: It depends on how bond yields abroad evolve. US Treasuries tend to be relatively high beta, implying that US yields usually fall more when global yields are declining (Chart 23). Thus, it would not surprise us if interest rate differentials moved against the dollar later this year. Chart 23US Treasuries Have A Higher Beta Than Most Other Government Bond Markets It is also important to remember that the US dollar is a countercyclical currency (Chart 24). If global growth picks up as pandemic dislocations fade and the Ukraine war winds down, the dollar is likely to weaken. Chart 24The Dollar Is A Countercyclical Currency A wider trade deficit could also imperil the greenback. The US trade deficit has increased from US$45 billion in December 2019 to US$110 billion. Equity inflows have helped finance the trade deficit, but net flows have turned negative of late (Chart 25). Finally, the dollar is quite expensive – 27% overvalued based on Purchasing Power Parity exchange rates. Q: Let’s sum up. Please review your asset allocation recommendations both for the next 12 months and beyond. A: To summarize, global inflation has peaked. Growth should pick up later this year as supply-chain bottlenecks abate. The combination of falling inflation and supply-side led growth will provide a springboard for equities. We expect global stocks to rise 15%-to-20% over the next 12 months. Historically, non-US stocks have outperformed their US peers when the dollar has been weakening (Chart 26). EM stocks, in particular, have done well in a weak dollar environment Chart 26Non-US Stocks Will Benefit From A Weaker US Dollar Chart 27The Market Is Too Pessimistic On Default Risk Within fixed-income portfolios, we recommend a modest long duration stance over the next 12 months. We favor high-yield credit over safer government bonds. US high-yield spreads imply a default rate of 6.2% over the next 12 months compared to a trailing 12-month default rate of only 1.2% (Chart 27). Chart 28Falling Inflation Will Buoy Consumer Sentiment Our guess is that this Goldilocks environment will end towards the end of next year. As inflation comes down, real wage growth will turn positive. Consumer confidence, which is now quite depressed, will improve (Chart 28). Stronger demand will cause inflation to reaccelerate in 2024, setting the stage for another round of central bank rate hikes. Peter Berezin Chief Global Strategist peterb@bcaresearch.com Follow me on LinkedIn Twitter Footnotes 1 The Federal Reserve targets an average inflation rate of 2% for the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index. Due to compositional differences between the two indices, CPI inflation has historically averaged 30-to-50 basis points higher than PCE inflation. This is why the Fed effectively targets a CPI inflation rate of 2.3%-to-2.5%. 2 The People’s Bank of China and the housing ministry issued a deleveraging framework for property developers in August 2020, consisting of a 70% ceiling on liabilities-to-assets, a net debt-to-equity ratio capped at 100%, and a limit on short-term borrowing that cannot exceed cash reserves. Developers breaching these “red lines” run the risk of being cut off from access to new loans from banks, while those who respect them can only increase their interest-bearing borrowing by 15% at most. Global Investment Strategy View Matrix Special Trade Recommendations Current MacroQuant Model Scores
Executive Summary Increase In Chinese Ag Prices Has Been Much More Muted Than Globally China’s food price inflation accelerated in April. The rising cost of global agricultural goods and domestic COVID-related disruptions in the supply-chain contributed to a sharp bump in food prices last month. China is not overly reliant on food imports. The country is also well stocked with grain reserves and should weather ongoing global food supply shortages, particularly wheat, better than most emerging economies. However, China will still be impacted by escalating prices of global agricultural products and energy. Some imported goods (e.g. soybeans and related products) that China relies on, coupled with higher energy costs and a bottoming in China’s pork prices, will continue to push up food prices and headline inflation. Higher reading in headline inflation will not change the direction of the PBoC’s monetary policy. However, more expensive food will dampen Chinese households’ spending power on non-food consumer goods, especially as income growth slows. The food and beverage sector in China’s onshore stocks will benefit from higher food costs. We are initiating a new trade: long domestic consumer staples/broad A-share market. CYCLICAL RECOMMENDATIONS (6 - 18 MONTHS) INITIATION DATE RETURN SINCE INCEPTION (%) COMMENT LONG DOMESTIC CONSUMER STAPLES/BROAD A-SHARE MARKET 05/18/2022 Bottom Line: Despite China’s solid self-sufficiency in food supplies, its food price inflation is not immune from the mounting prices of global agricultural products. Is China’s Food Price Inflation Transitory? The food component of China’s consumer price index (CPI) increased by 0.9% in April compared with the previous month, a sharp reversal from a 1.2% month-over-month decline in March. Higher food and energy prices pushed headline CPI to 2.1% in April, the fastest year-on-year growth since August 2020. China is not overly reliant on food imports and has abundant grain reserves. The country is in a better position to weather ongoing global supply shortages in grain compared with other emerging economies, such as the Middle East and North Africa. Moreover, agricultural product prices in China have been structurally higher than those traded in the global commodity market. Large margins in China’s bulk agricultural pricing provide a cushion from escalating global food prices. Nonetheless, China remains at risk for higher food prices this year. Elevated oil prices and the war in Ukraine will further lift the price of fertilizers, adding to input costs for agricultural products. A strong USD will add to the price of USD-denominated commodity imports, particularly soybeans. In addition, China’s domestic pork price may have reached its hog cycle bottom and will pick up in the second half of this year. Food Prices Are Driving Up Inflation China’s headline CPI accelerated to 2.1% in April, on a year-on-year basis, from 1.5% in the previous month. Even though pork prices plunged by 33% in April from a year ago, food prices grew by 1.9% and have been boosted by a jump in the cost of fresh food, such as vegetables (+24% year-on-year), fruit (+14%) and eggs (+12%). Prices in other food categories, such as grains and edible oil, also rose, albeit more modestly (Chart 1A and 1B). Chart 1ALarge Jump In Fresh Food Prices In April Chart 1BOther Food Prices Also Picked Up, But More Modestly China’s strict COVID-19 containment measures have had a broad-based impact on food supplies. Mobility restrictions, roadblocks and risk-averse truck drivers introduced significant challenges in food supplies and transportation. Lockdowns in some large urban areas also led to panic buying and stockpiling among consumers, pushing up demand. Chart 2Increase In Chinese Ag Prices Has Been Much More Muted Than Globally Meanwhile, higher global food and energy prices have likely both directly and indirectly contributed to food price inflation in China. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Food Price Index in April this year leapt to its highest level since its inception in 1990; it is 30% higher than last year and nearly double from its trough in mid-2020. Although price increases in China’s domestic agricultural products have been more moderate, the country’s agricultural wholesale prices have jumped by 10% from a year ago (Chart 2). Bottom Line: Food accounts for about 20% of China’s CPI basket (Chart 3). Climbing food, along with energy, prices are driving up China’s headline inflation. Chart 3Food Accounts For 20% Of Chinese Household Budgets China Is In A Good Position To Weather Global Food Supply Shocks … Chart 4Ex-China Food Inventories Haven’t Been Built China is well stocked with food reserves and does not rely on imports for most of its agricultural supplies. Thus, the country should weather ongoing global shortages in the food supply better than most emerging economies (Chart 4). China’s food inventories are significantly higher than levels in the 2006-2008 and 2010-2012 global food price hikes (Chart 5). The nation’s inventories have been steadily building up in the past decade to avert potential food supply shortages. Corn and rice stocks are sufficient to cover consumption for nearly three quarters of a year and wheat stocks are at nearly a year’s worth of consumption. Chart 5China Has Been Building Up Inventories To Buffer Against Supply Shortfalls Chart 6China Is Not Overly Dependent On Ag Imports Furthermore, with the exception of soybeans, China is not overly dependent on imports for agricultural supplies (Chart 6). The country is self-sufficient in supplying rice, wheat, and corn, three major staples in China’s grain consumption basket. Less than 5% of China’s total consumption of the three staple grains comes from imports. Bottom Line: China is well stocked with agriculture products and is not overly dependent on imports for its food supplies. … But Not Immune To Food Price Hikes Worldwide Chart 7Ag Products Are Traded At Higher Prices In China Than In The Global Market Rising global agricultural and energy prices could still push up the country’s food price inflation. In USD terms, prices of China’s domestic agricultural products have been structurally higher than those traded on global commodity markets (Chart 7). The government heavily regulates and subsidizes its agricultural procurement prices as an encouragement to domestic farmers. When global food supply shocks sharply pushed up agricultural prices worldwide, China’s domestic agricultural prices, with their large buffer versus global food prices, rose more moderately. Nonetheless, China’s domestic food prices are not insulated from worldwide price hikes. China is facing higher inflation in food prices this year for the following reasons: Pork prices, which account for 13% of China’s CPI food basket, have likely bottomed. Although pork prices remain in a deep contraction year-over-year, they rebounded sharply in April on a month-on-month basis (Chart 8). The number of sows peaked in mid-2021 and has been declining for the past 10 consecutive months. Falling sow numbers have historically led to rising pork prices (Chart 9). Chart 8Pork Prices May Have Bottomed Chart 9Pork Prices Will Likely Increase In 2H22 Nearly 90% of China’s soybean consumption relies on imports, making the country vulnerable to external price fluctuations. Soybean prices have jumped sharply this year. A stronger USD will also add to the price of USD-denominated commodity imports. About 80% of Chinese soybeans are crushed to produce meal to feed China’s massive pork industry, which means higher soybean prices will indirectly lead to rising pork prices by boosting input costs. Given that pig output is approaching its cyclical bottom, an increase in pig livestock would mean more demand for soybeans. Chart 10Edible Oil Prices Reached Their Highest In Decades Growing prices in soybeans and corn will lift the cost of cooking oil, which represents about 8% of China’s food CPI basket (Chart 10). Ukraine supplies 30% of China’s corn imports, and Russia and Ukraine together account for nearly 20% of China’s soybean oil imports. China ramped up corn imports from Ukraine through March despite the war and snapped up large volumes of US corn in April after supplies from Ukraine were cut off. Nonetheless, prices of soybeans and corn will likely remain elevated with no end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war and supply shortages globally. In addition, as global travel becomes more popular and oil prices remain elevated, the demand for corn-based ethanol, which is blended with gasoline, will also expand. Wheat prices will continue to experience upward pressure in the global market, mainly due to reduced production and exports from Ukraine and Russia (these countries account for 30% of world’s wheat exports). The World Bank forecasts that wheat will be 40% more expensive this year, reaching an all-time high in nominal terms.1 Although China is about 96% self-sufficient in wheat, the upsurge in global prices has boosted China’s domestic cost for wheat; it climbed by 15% in May from a year ago (Chart 11). Higher shipping and input costs, especially for fertilizers, will exacerbate the upside price pressures on agricultural goods. China is the world’s largest exporter of phosphate fertilizer, but its domestic fertilizer prices are heavily subsidized and much cheaper than exported ones (Chart 12). However, the domestic cost of fertilizer will likely follow the lead of rising global prices for fertilizers and agricultural products. Chart 11Chinese Wheat Prices Jumped Against The Backdrop Of Global Supply Shortages Chart 12China's Domestic Fertilizer Prices Will Likely Trend Up The relationship between agricultural prices and the dollar broke down early last year (Chart 13). Historically, a strong USD would weigh down agricultural prices by encouraging ex-US producers to raise exports and boost global supplies. However, the COVID pandemic and war in Ukraine have triggered a global surge in government controls on food exports. Such broad enforcement of protectionist measures will continue to exacerbate worldwide inflationary pressures on food. Chart 13The Inverse Relationship Between Global Ag Prices And The Dollar Has Broken Down Bottom Line: China’s food prices face upward pressure. Strengthening global prices in a wide range of agricultural products, coupled with higher energy costs and a bottoming in China’s pork prices, will all contribute to higher food price inflation in the country. Investment Conclusions Chart 14Core CPI Remains Subdued Food price inflation should not constrain the PBoC from further easing monetary policy. As mentioned in previous reports, China’s monetary policy framework has shifted away from headline CPI and has been anchored in core CPI, which has remained subdued (Chart 14). However, China’s accelerating food and energy prices, as household income growth is slowing, will lower households’ purchasing power and curb their demand for non-food consumer goods and services. While China’s overall consumption and economy will suffer from higher food price inflation, soaring food prices will help to widen the profit margins among food processing firms (Chart 15). Furthermore, food and beverage companies in China’s onshore equity market have one of the highest ROAs and the lowest financial leverages (Chart 16). We are initiating a new trade: long Chinese onshore consumer staples/short broad A-share market. Chart 15Long Chinese Onshore Consumer Staples... Chart 16...As The Sector Will Benefit From Rising Food Prices Jing Sima China Strategist jings@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 The World Bank’s Commodity Markets Outlook Report, April 2022. Strategic Themes Cyclical Recommendations
Executive Summary Ingredients For A Policy Mistake The hawks on the European Central Bank Governing Council have become vocal about a July rate hike. Such a move would be a policy mistake because European growth is weak, while inflation is supply-driven and will soften meaningfully. July 2022 hike is not yet certain. A policy mistake suggests that the current interest rate pricing for June 23 is too aggressive. Buy June 2023 Euribor contract. The serious risk of a policy mistake and the uncertainty surrounding Europe’s energy security confirm that investors should maintain a defensive stance in European assets. The pronounced threats to UK growth warrant a negative view on the pound. Recommendation INCEPTION DATE RETURN SINCE INCEPTION (%) COMMENT Buy June 2023 Euribor contract 05/09/2022 Bottom Line: Stay defensive in Europe. The risk of a policy mistake is high. Only when inflation peaks should investors move into cyclical stocks. In recent weeks, a chorus of ECB hawks expressed the need to increase rates as early as July 2022. Inflation data is on their side; HICP stands at 7.5% and core CPI has reached 3.5%, levels never seen since the introduction of the euro. Markets are responding. The ESTR curve is pricing in a positive ECB deposit rate for the October 2022 Governing Council meeting. We need to examine the underlying European economic picture to address two key questions: Will the ECB lift rates as early as July? And will doing so constitute a policy mistake that would hurt European assets? Weaker Growth Let’s start with the growth outlook. European economic activity is rapidly deteriorating. Real GDP growth in the Eurozone has slowed markedly. In Q1, real GDP growth fell to 0.2% quarter-on-quarter or an annualized rate of 0.8%. Worrisomely, Italy’s GDP contracted by -0.2% over that time frame and the very economically sensitive Swedish activity contracted by -0.4%, which suggests that Europe’s deceleration is only starting. Soft data confirm the flagging economic outlook on the continent. Consumer confidence is plunging to levels that are consistent with a recession, led by the collapse in the willingness to make large purchases (Chart 1, top panel). The ZEW as well as the Ifo survey confirm that growth expectations point to a very large decline in output (Chart 1, bottom panel). The weakness is also evident in hard data. High inflation erodes real household income, which squeezes consumer spending. Retail sales across Europe are slowing sharply, only growing at an annual rate of 0.8% while contracting -0.4% on a monthly basis; on a level basis, they are lower today than they were in June 2021. Meanwhile, German retail sales volumes are falling at a -5.4% annual rate. The situation is even worse for new car registrations, which are collapsing at an annual rate of 20.2% (Chart 2). Chart 1Soft Data Point To Soft Growth... Chart 2...So Do Hard Data Industrial production has not been spared. Euro Area IP softened to 2% annually in February and contractions are now visible in Germany and France. Some of this weakness reflects supply difficulties, but the -3.1% annual fall in German factory orders indicates that demand is frail too and that industrial production will shrink further in the months ahead (Chart 2, bottom panel). The deterioration in the global outlook further hurts Europe economic prospects. Our global growth tax indicator, based on energy prices, the dollar, and global bond yields, points toward a further deceleration in the global and US manufacturing PMI, it suggests Euro Area PMIs could fall below 50 (Chart 3). China woes continue to reverberate throughout the global economy. Potential supply constraints will hurt industrial production, but, more importantly, the weakness in China’s marginal propensity to consume (as measured by the gap between the growth rate of M1 relative to M2) predicts a much greater deterioration in European industrial orders, which means that the demand for European capital goods will slow (Chart 3, bottom panel). Chart 3Risks To The Downside Chart 4Tightening Financial Conditions European financial conditions are also tightening significantly. The iTraxx Crossover Index is rising swiftly. European high-yield corporate spreads are now above 450bps, levels that coincide with past recessions in the Euro Area (Chart 4). Government bond markets are increasingly under duress too. Italian BTPs now yield close to 200bps above German Bunds (Chart 4, bottom panel), which accentuates the periphery’s pain. Bottom Line: The Eurozone economy is slowing sharply. While Q1 GDP avoided a contraction, soft and hard data indicators suggest that Q2 is likely to record an actual output contraction for the whole Euro bloc. High Inflation, But For How Long? At first glance, European inflation numbers scream for an ECB rate hike, preferably one yesterday. However, the picture is not that clear-cut. Supply factors predominantly drive the Eurozone’s inflation surge. Chart 5 highlights the role of energy, utilities, food, and transportation costs in the HICP and shows that these factors account for more than 80% of the 7.5% HICP rate. Moreover, the fluctuations in energy CPI continue to explain most of the gyration in headline CPI. The close relationship between energy CPI and core CPI highlights an elevated degree of pass-though, the result of higher electricity and transportation costs (Chart 6). Chart 5Energy, Food And Transport Dominate European CPI Chart 6All About Energy Chart 7No Demand Pull-Inflation In Europe Unlike those in the US, Euro Area underlying inflation drivers are weak and inconsistent with demand-pull inflation. Wage growth in Europe stands at a paltry 1.6% annual rate, while in the US, the Atlanta Fed Wage Tracker has jumped to 4.5% (Chart 7, top panel). Moreover, Eurozone rent inflation remains stable at 1.2%, while it is a very elevated 4.5% in the US (Chart 7, bottom panel). The bifurcation in demand-driven inflation reflects vastly different output gaps between the two regions. US nominal GDP stands 2.5% above its 2014-2019 trend, while that of the Eurozone is still 5.3% below it. In the consumer durable goods sector, where the US experienced the greatest demand-supply mismatch – and therefore, the greatest inflation pressures – purchases are 25% above their 2014-2019 trend, while in Europe, they are still 9.5% below that trend (Chart 8) Year-on-year inflation prints should roll over this summer, as highlighted by weakening sequential inflation. Even if it remains elevated, the monthly Trimmed Mean CPI peaked last year. Energy inflation, moreover, is already contracting on a month-to-month basis (Chart 9). Chart 8Mind The Output Gap Chart 9Weakening Sequential Inflation Chart 10A Naive Inflation Forecast Simple simulation exercises also confirm that annual inflation will peak this summer (Chart 10). Monthly headline inflation averaged 0.11% from 2010 to 2019, 0.31% in the first half of 2021, and 0.55% from mid-2021 to January 2022. If we assume that monthly inflation prints remain in line with its most recent average, annual inflation will peak by year-end at 9.1%, before falling to 6.8% by April 2023. However, if monthly inflation falls back to an historically elevated monthly average of 0.31%, annual headline inflation will peak in September and fall back to 3.8% by April 2023. Similarly, if monthly core CPI averages 0.28%, annual core CPI will peak in October before declining to 3.4% by April 2023, but it will fall to 2.1% by April 2023, if monthly core CPI averages an historically elevated 0.17%, or the average observed in the first half of 2021 (Chart 10, bottom two panels). Chart 11A Conditional Inflation Forecast A more sophisticated exercise based on energy prices and the EUR/USD exchange rate also underlines the downside for Euro Area headline inflation. Energy inflation, which drives headline CPI, closely tracks the evolution of brent prices in euro terms and Deutsch natural gas prices. Assuming that natural gas prices average the historically very high level of €100/MWh over the next twelve months, that Brent averages US$95/bbl over that time frame (consistent with BCA’s commodity and energy team forecasts), and that the euro progressively moves back to EUR/USD1.10 by April 2023 (a weaker expectation than BCA’s Foreign Exchange Strategy team anticipates), then the Eurozone’s energy inflation will collapse to -10% by April 2023 (Chart 11). We can also assume that Russia enacts a full energy embargo on Western Europe if Sweden and Finland apply for NATO membership. In this case, Brent would spike quickly to $140/bbl and natural gas to €250/MWh. In our scenario, prices stay elevated for two months, before they ultimately normalize by early 2023. Under this scenario, energy inflation would experience a spike to 80% (!) in June 2022 before falling back sharply. In all cases, the collapse in energy inflation is consistent with a rapid decline in headline inflation toward 2% in 2023. Bottom Line: European inflation is elevated but remains mainly driven by supply factors, particularly the evolution of energy inflation. Demand-pull inflation is minimal, unlike that in the US. Additionally, both core and headline inflations are set to peak in the coming months based on the evolution of sequential monthly inflation as well as the behavior of the energy market. A July ECB rate hike would constitute a policy mistake for three reasons: (i) the ECB has no control over supply-driven inflation; (ii) Eurozone inflation is set to weaken; and (iii) economic growth will remain poor. Investment Implications Despite the noise made by the hawks, a large amount of uncertainty around the July 2022 meeting’s outcome remains. It is easy to forget that the ECB’s decisions are consensual. Influential members such as Vice-President Luis de Guindos continues to see a July 2022 hike as possible but unlikely. Others, such as Executive Board member Fabio Panetta, are very worried about the Eurozone’s economic slowdown. Moreover, ECB President Christine Lagarde has not endorsed the hawks. In the context of weak growth and a potential top in inflation, achieving consensus about an early summer hike could be difficult. Chart 12Patience Would Be Rewarded The great paradox is that, if the ECB waits before pushing interest rates up, it will have an opportunity to increase rates durably next year. Wage growth is anemic today, but the decline in the Eurozone unemployment rate is consistent with a pickup in salaries in 2023 (Chart 12). Moreover, if energy inflation slows, the relative price-shock that is hurting households and domestic demand will ebb, which will allow consumption to recover. Patience would give Europe strength and the ECB a very strong basis to lift rates sustainably. The hawks will sway the council to their views. Inflation has latency, which means that its inertia may cause HICP to remain elevated beyond this summer. Moreover, the EU’s proposed ban on Russian oil imports along with Sweden’s and Finland’s likely accession-demand to NATO in the upcoming weeks could provoke Russia to strike first by cutting all its energy export to the EU to zero immediately. This would lift inflation for somewhat longer, as we showed in Chart 9. Related Report European Investment StrategyThe Three Forces Hurting European Earnings In response to the significant risk of a rate hike, we continue to recommend investors stay short cyclical stocks relative to defensive ones. Moreover, if the risk of a Russian energy cutoff increases, so does the threat of a severe recession in Europe, as a recent Bundesbank study posits (Chart 13). Capital preservation is paramount in today’s context; thus, we continue to lean on the side of prudence, especially considering Europe’s soft profit outlook. Once risks recede, we will abandon this strategy. This decision, however, would require clarification of Sweden and Finland’s decision about their membership in NATO as well as Russia’s response, a confirmation that the ECB is not hiking rates in July, and a pullback in inflation surprises, which would prove a powerful help for European equities and the cyclicals/defensive split (Chart 14). Chart 13The Russian Embargo Risk Chart 14Wait For Inflation To Turn In fact, our view that inflation will peak leads to direct implications for European markets. The periods that followed the previous four peaks in European core inflation were associated with an outperformance of small-cap stocks and cyclical stocks over the subsequent six and twelve months as well as declines in German yields and narrower credit spreads (Table 1A). The sectoral implications were not as clear, but industrials enjoyed an edge, while healthcare stocks suffered marked declines. Our conviction is strongest that energy CPI will fall. Again, this environment is associated with an outperformance of small-caps stocks and cyclicals over the following six months (Table 1B). Sector-wise, energy names suffer in this climate along with defensives, especially communication services equities. Table 1APeaks In Core CPI & Subsequent European Asset Performance Table 1BPeaks In Energy CPI & Subsequent European Asset Performance Looking at this period of disinflation more broadly rather than just following peaks in inflation, we find similar results. Declining core CPI is associated with an outperformance of cyclicals relative to defensives as well as strength in small-cap equities (Table 2A). This larger sample allows for a clearer view of sectors. Specifically, the performance of industrials and tech relative to the broad market improves markedly, while utilities suffer greatly. We reach roughly similar conclusions when energy CPI is contracting, except that, in this instance, energy stocks also underperform (Table 2B). Interestingly, so do financial companies. This is a surprising result, but previous instances of weaker energy CPI in the sample reflected weaker demand, not an evolving supply shock. Weaker aggregate demand always hurts financials. Table 2ADisinflation & Subsequent European Asset Performance Table 2BEnergy Deflation & Subsequent European Asset Performance Bottom Line: The risk of a policy mistake at the July ECB meeting is elevated. A policy mistake suggests that the current interest rate pricing for June 23 is too aggressive. Buy June 2023 Euribor contract. Moreover, Russian energy exports are still under threat. Accordingly, we continue to emphasize capital preservation and favor defensives over cyclicals. However, a buying opportunity will emerge rapidly once inflation peaks, especially if the ECB follows our base case. At this point, investors should buy small-cap and cyclical stocks. Industrials will beat energy, while all the defensive sectors will suffer. The BoE’s Tough Choice The Bank of England is stuck between a rock and a hard place. UK inflation shares characteristics of that of both the Eurozone and the US. On the one hand, energy inflation is increasing and could push headline CPI into double-digit territory around October 2022, once fuel subsidies fully expire. On the other hand, wage growth is strong as labor supply elasticity declined after Brexit. Demand-pull inflation is also rampant, which has pushed core CPI to a 5.7% annual rate. The UK’s cost push inflation, along with the growth slowdown in Europe and increasing tax rates are likely to cause a recession in the UK over the coming twelve months. The demand-pull inflation, however, will force the BoE to hike interest rates. This accentuates the downside risk to UK economic activity. Chart 15BoE's First Victim: The Pound The obvious victim of this configuration is the pound. Weak growth will prevent the BoE from matching the pace of rate hikes of the Fed and poor economic growth will detract from investments in the UK. As a result, we see further downside in GBP/USD (Chart 15). BCA’s FX strategy team is also selling the pound versus the euro. This position is likely to generate further gains as investors will revise down their views for UK economic activity relative to the Euro Area, since they already hold much more dire expectations for the latter than the former. Bottom Line: EUR/GBP possesses more upside. The growth outlook for the Eurozone is poor, but investors currently overestimate the growth path of the UK relative to that of its southern neighbor. Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com Tactical Recommendations Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations
Chart 1 Both the US and Global PMIs surprised to the downside this week with the US ISM Manufacturing PMI printing 55.4 vs 57.6 expected. The ISM PMI fell by 1.7 points from 57.1 while its employment sub-component fell by impressive 5 points (from 56 to 50.9). Worse still, the new orders-to-inventories ratio (NOI) remains in the free fall, foreshadowing further weakness in manufacturing activity (see chart). The disappointing NOI ratio is unlikely to be a one-off anomalous print considering a backdrop of the slowing demand for durable goods, falling consumer purchasing power, and surging oil prices. The NOI ratio contraction is also reminiscent of the 2004 episode – one of the few instances when the Fed tightened monetary policy into a slowing economy. Notably, 2004 marked the peak in cyclical/defensive equities for the entire pre-GFC cycle. When it comes to portfolio positioning, weak manufacturing data validates our recent rotation away from cyclical sectors and towards defensives (please see our most recent Strategy Report for a more detailed discussion). Bottom Line: We continue to recommend investors remain cautious and add defensive exposure to reduce portfolio volatility as the global manufacturing cycle slows down.
In lieu of next week’s report, I will be presenting a webcast titled ‘The 5 Big Mispricings In The Markets Right Now, And How To Profit From Them’. I do hope you can join. Executive Summary Just as the railway timetables set in train the First World War, central bank timetables for aggressive rate hikes are setting in train a global recession. Demand is already cool, so aggressive rate hikes will take it to outright cold. The risk is elevated because central banks are desperate to repair their damaged credibility on fighting inflation, and it may be their last chance. Inflationary fears and hawkishness from central banks are weighing on bonds and stocks, and it may take some weeks, or months, for inflation fears to recede. But we could be approaching a turning point. By the summer, core inflation should be receding. Furthermore, the fractal structures of the sell-offs in both the 30-year T-bond and the tech-heavy NASDAQ index are approaching points of extreme fragility that have signalled inflection points. Fractal trading watchlist: 30-year T-bond, NASDAQ, FTSE 100 versus Euro Stoxx 50, Netherlands versus Switzerland, and Petcare (PAWZ). US Inflation Is Hot, But Demand Is Not Bottom Line: Tactically cautious, but long-term investors who do not need to time the market bottom should overweight bonds and overweight long-duration defensive equities versus short-duration cyclical equities – for example, overweight US versus non-US equities. Feature The First World War, the historian AJP Taylor famously argued, was “imposed on the statesmen of Europe by railway timetables.” Taylor proposed that the railways and their timetables were so central to troop mobilisation – and specifically, the German Schlieffen Plan – that a plan once set in motion could not be stopped. “Once started the wagons and carriages must roll remorselessly and inevitably to their predestined goal.” Otherwise, the whole process would unravel, and an opportunity to demonstrate military credibility would be lost that might never come again. Today, could a global recession be imposed upon us by central bank timetables for aggressive rate hikes? Just as it was difficult to unwind the troop mobilisation that led to the Great War, it will be difficult to back down from the aggressive rate hikes that the central banks have timetabled, at least in the near term. Otherwise, an opportunity to demonstrate inflation fighting credibility would be lost that might never come again. Just as the railway timetables set in train the First World War, central bank timetables for aggressive rate hikes may set in train another global recession. Unfortunately, central banks do not have precision weapons. Quite the contrary, monetary tightening is a blunt instrument which works by cooling overall demand. But demand is already cool, as evidenced by the contraction of the US economy in the first quarter. In their zeal to repair their damaged credibility on fighting inflation, the danger is that central banks take the economy from cool to outright cold. Granted, the US economy was dragged down by a drop in inventories and net exports. But even US domestic demand – which strips out inventories and net exports – is barely on its pre-pandemic trend (Chart I-1). Meanwhile, the euro area economy is still 5 percent below its pre-pandemic trend (Chart I-2). To reiterate, by hiking rates aggressively into economies that are at best lukewarm, central banks are risking an outright recession. Chart I-1US Inflation Is Hot, But Demand Is Not Chart I-2Euro Area Inflation Is Hot, But Demand Is Not Our Three-Point Checklist For A Recession Has Three Ticks My colleague Peter Berezin has created a three-point checklist for a recession: The build-up of an imbalance makes the economy vulnerable to downturn. A catalyst exposes this imbalance. Amplifiers exacerbate the downturn. Is there a major imbalance? You bet there is. The post-pandemic 26 percent overspend on durable goods in the US constitutes one of the greatest imbalances in economic history. Other advanced economies also experienced unprecedented binges on durable goods. The catalyst that is exposing this major imbalance is the realisation that durable goods are, well, durable. So, if you overspent on durables in 2020/21, then the risk is that you symmetrically underspend in 2022/23 (Chart I-3). The post-pandemic 26 percent overspend on durable goods in the US constitutes one of the greatest imbalances in economic history. Meanwhile, a future underspend on goods cannot be countered by an overspend on services because the consumption of services is constrained by time, opportunity, and biology. There is a limit to how often you can eat out, go to the movies, or go to the doctor (Chart I-4). Indeed, for certain services, an underspend will persist, because we have made some permanent post-pandemic changes to our lifestyles: for example, hybrid office/home working and more online shopping and online medical care. Chart I-3An Overspend On Goods Can Be Corrected By A Subsequent Underspend... Chart I-4...But An Underspend On Services Cannot Be Corrected By A Subsequent Overspend Finally, the amplifier that will exacerbate the downturn is monetary tightening. If central banks follow their railway timetables for aggressive rate hikes, a goods downturn will magnify into an outright recession. So, in Peter’s three-point checklist, we now have tick, tick, and tick. Inflation Is Hot, But Demand Is Not If economic demand is at best lukewarm, then what caused the post-pandemic inflation that central banks are now fighting? The simple answer is massive fiscal stimulus combined with the equally massive shift in spending to durable goods. Locked at home and flush with government supplied cash, we couldn’t spend it on services, so we spent it on goods. This created a massive shock in the distribution of demand, out of services whose supply could easily adjust downwards, and into goods whose supply could not easily adjust upwards. For example, airlines could cut back their flights, but auto manufacturers couldn’t make more cars. So, airfares didn’t collapse but used car prices went vertical! The causality from stimulus payments to durable goods spending to core inflation is irrefutable. The causality from stimulus payments to durable goods spending to core inflation is irrefutable. The biggest surges in US durable goods spending all coincided with the government’s stimulus checks (Chart I-5). And the three separate surges in month-on-month core inflation all occurred after surges in durable goods demand (Chart I-6). As further proof, core inflation is highest in those economies where the stimulus checks and furlough schemes were the most generous – like the US and the UK. Chart I-5Stimulus Checks Caused The Surges in Durable Goods Spending Chart I-6The Surges In Durable Goods Spending Caused The Surges In Core Inflation What Does All This Mean For Investment Strategy? Our high conviction view is that the pandemic’s inflationary impulse combined with the Ukraine war will turn out to be demand-destructive, and thereby ultimately morph into a deflationary impulse. Yet central banks are all pumped up to demonstrate their inflation fighting credibility. Given that this credibility is badly damaged, it may be their last opportunity to repair it before it is shattered forever. To repeat, just as the railway timetables set in train the First World War, central bank timetables for aggressive rate hikes may set in train another global recession. That said, a recession is not inevitable. The interest rate that matters most for the economy and the markets is not the policy rate that central banks want to hike aggressively, it is the long-duration bond yield. A lower bond yield can underpin both the economy and the financial markets, just as it did during the pandemic in 2020. But to the extent that the bond market is following the real economic data, we are in a dangerous phase. Because, as is typical at an inflection point, the real data will be noisy and ambiguous. Meaning it may take some weeks, or months, for inflation fears to be trumped by growth fears. On March 10th, in Are We In A Slow-Motion Crash? we predicted: “On a tactical (3-month) horizon, the inflationary impulse from soaring energy and food prices combined with the choke on growth from sanctions will weigh on both the global economy and the global stock market. As such, bond yields could nudge higher, the global stock market has yet to reach its crisis bottom, and the US dollar will rally” That prediction proved to be spot on! Recession, or no recession, we are still in a difficult period for markets because inflationary fears and hawkishness from central banks are weighing on bonds and stocks, while buoying the US dollar. As such, tactical caution is still warranted. Fractal structures of the sell-offs in both the 30-year T-bond and the tech-heavy NASDAQ index are approaching points of extreme fragility. But we could be approaching a turning point. By the summer, core inflation should be receding. Furthermore, the fractal structures of the sell-offs in both the 30-year T-bond and the tech-heavy NASDAQ index are approaching points of extreme fragility that have reliably signalled previous inflection points (Chart I-7 and Chart I-8). Chart I-7The Sell-Off In The 30-Year T-Bond Is Approaching Fractal Fragility Chart I-8The Sell-Off In The NASDAQ Is Approaching Fractal Fragility The advice for long-term investors who do not need to time the market bottom is: Bonds will ultimately rally. Overweight the 30-year T-bond and the 30-year Chinese bond. Equities will be conflicted between slowing growth which will weigh on cyclical profits, and falling bond yields which will buoy long-duration valuations. Therefore, overweight long-duration defensive sectors and markets versus short-duration cyclical sectors and markets. For example, overweight US versus non-US equities. Fractal Trading Watchlist As just discussed, the sell-offs in the 30-year T-bond and the NASDAQ are approaching points of fractal fragility that have signalled previous turning points. Hence, we are adding both investments to our watchlist. Also added to our watchlist is the outperformance of the FTSE100 versus Euro Stoxx 50, and the underperformance of Netherlands versus Switzerland, both of which are approaching potential reversals. Our final addition is Petcare (PAWZ). After a stellar 2020, Petcare gave back most of its gains in 2021. But this underperformance is now approaching a point of fragility which might provide a new entry point. There are no new trades this week, but the full watchlist of investments at, or approaching, turning points is available on our website: cpt.bcaresearch.com Fractal Trading Watchlist: New Additions A Potential New Entry Point Into Petcare FTSE100 Outperformance Vs. Euro Stoxx 50 Vulnerable To Reversal Netherlands Underperformance Vs. Switzerland Close To Exhaustion Chart 1The Strong Trend In The 18-Month-Out US Interest Rate Future Is Fragile Chart 2The Strong Trend In The 3 Year T-Bond Is Fragile Chart 3AUD/KRW Is Vulnerable To Reversal Chart 4Canada Versus Japan Is Reversing Chart 5Canada's TSX-60's Outperformance Might Be Over Chart 6US Healthcare Providers Vs. Software At Risk of Reversal Chart 7A Potential Switching Point From Tobacco Into Cannabis Chart 8Biotech Is A Major Buy Chart 9CAD/SEK Reversal Has Started Chart 10Financials Versus Industrials To Reverse Chart 11Norway's Outperformance Could End Chart 12Greece's Brief Outperformance To End Chart 13BRL/NZD At A Resistance Point Chart 14The Outperformance Of Resources Versus Healthcare Is Vulnerable To Reversal Chart 15The Outperformance Of Resources Versus Biotech Has Started To Reverse Chart 16Cotton's Outperformance Is Vulnerable To Reversal Chart 17US Homebuilders' Underperformance Has Reached A Potential Turning Point Chart 18Switzerland's Outperformance Vs. Germany Has Started To End Chart 19The Rally In USD/EUR Could End Chart 20The Outperformance Of MSCI Hong Kong Versus China Is Vulnerable To Reversal Chart 21A Potential New Entry Point Into Petcare Chart 22FTSE100 Outperformance Vs. Euro Stoxx 50 Vulnerable To Reversal Chart 23Netherlands Underperformance Vs. Switzerland Close To Exhaustion Dhaval Joshi Chief Strategist dhaval@bcaresearch.com Fractal Trading System Fractal Trades 6-Month Recommendations Structural Recommendations Closed Fractal Trades Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-1Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Euro Area Chart II-2Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Europe Ex Euro Area Chart II-3Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Asia Chart II-4Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields - Other Developed Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-5Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-6Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-7Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-8Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations
Executive Summary More Chinese Households Intend To Save Than To Invest The Politburo meeting last Friday signaled that China is determined to achieve the 5.5% annual growth target set earlier this year. Policymakers vowed to accelerate the implementation of existing pro-growth measures and hinted that they may scale up stimulus due to domestic challenges and external uncertainties. However, Chinese policymakers are facing an “impossible trinity” of eliminating domestic COVID cases and avoiding an overshoot as they stimulate the economy, while trying to achieve a high rate of economic expansion. The Politburo did not mention any plans to boost income and consumption via direct fiscal transfers to households, a sector that has been a weak link in China’s economy in the past two years. China’s consumption growth and demand for housing will not recover any time soon without meaningful aids to shore up household income. Bottom Line: Policy stimulus measures announced so far fall short of what is required to lift the economy. Given constraints on household consumption and the property market, China’s economic growth is set to underwhelm and Chinese stock prices will underperform their global counterparts. China’s top leaders have pledged to provide more support to the economy. The Politburo meeting last week indicated that the 5.5% growth target set for 2022 will be maintained and stimulus measures will be accelerated. Chinese stocks in both on- and offshore markets rebounded sharply following the positive rhetoric. Related Report Emerging Markets StrategyA Whiff Of Stagflation? In our view, however, Chinese authorities are facing an “impossible trinity” as they simultaneously attempt to achieve three goals: (1) pursuing a dynamic zero-Covid policy, (2) delivering decent economic growth, and (3) not resorting to “irrigation-style” massive stimulus. The pro-growth measures announced last week by the government lack the needed elements to generate a quick and strong rebound in the economy, particularly in the household and property sectors. Hence, the rebound in Chinese stock prices will unlikely progress into a cyclical rally (over a 6- to 12-month time span). We maintain our neutral allocation in Chinese onshore stocks and an underweight stance on the MSCI China Index, within a global portfolio. An “Impossible Trinity” The messages from the Politburo meeting highlight policymakers’ determination to shore up the economy. However, the authorities are not backing away from the zero-COVID policy, which is taking a heavy toll as cities are forced into lockdown to contain outbreaks. In addition, the Politburo reiterated the housing policy principle that “housing is for living, not for speculation” and did not mention concrete measures to boost household consumption. Thus, the biggest challenge for China to achieve its growth target this year is how to normalize economic activity without resorting to another round of “irrigation-style” stimulus while keeping domestic COVID cases at bay. In an environment of frequent lockdowns, monetary and fiscal easing have limited effect as the private and household sectors are averse to taking risks. China’s zero-COVID policy comes with hefty economic costs. April’s PMI showed sharp declines in a wide range of business activities due to the prolonged lockdown in Shanghai and several other cities (Chart 1). The new orders, new export orders, and imports subindexes in the manufacturing PMI and services PMI, all fell to their lowest levels since Q1 2020 when COVID first hit China (Chart 2). Chart 1April PMIs Show Widespread Declines In Business Activities Chart 2PMI Subindexes Fell To Lowest Levels Since Q1 2020 Going forward, even if China manages to avoid a Shanghai-style month-long lockdown, the dynamic zero-COVID policy will have devastating ramifications on the economy. Notably, March economic data from the city of Shenzhen, China’s technology center, suggests that even a week-long lockdown has had large impact on the local economic activity. Chart 3Severe Economic Disruptions In Shenzhen Due To A Week-Long City Lockdown In contrast with the extensive outbreak in Shanghai, Shenzhen was able to contain its COVID cases at an early stage and endured a citywide lockdown for only one week in mid-March. However, Shenzhen’s export growth contracted by 12.8% year-on-year (YoY) in March, a stark contrast from the 14.7%YoY increase in exports on a national level. The city’s imports fell by 11.9%YoY, also significantly lower than China’s total import growth, which was flat (Chart 3). Retail sales of consumer goods in Shenzhen shrank by 1.6%YoY in March and home sales plummeted by a stunning 90%YoY during the week of March 13-20. On the national level, the Politburo has called for an acceleration in infrastructure investment through frontloading local government special purpose bonds (SPB) and fast-tracking infrastructure project approvals. However, the lack of details has created questions regarding the magnitude of incremental stimulus, or whether the stepped-up policy effort will involve an increase in SPB or a general bond quota for local governments. Chart 4Construction Activity Started Softening In March, Before Shanghai Lockdown The stringent COVID containment methods will also undermine the effectiveness of China’s pro-growth measures. As expected, China’s construction activity PMI tumbled in April amid the lockdowns, but the new orders and business expectations components in the construction PMI had already started to slide in March (Chart 4, top and middle panels). Moreover, employment in the labor-intensive construction sector also declined substantially in March and April (Chart 4, bottom panel). The deterioration in these indicators is consistent with our view that even short and less draconian lockdowns spark considerable disruptions in business activities. Bottom Line: There is a low likelihood that China will deviate from its existing zero-COVID policy for the rest of this year. As such, boosting the economy via stimulus will be challenging due to frequent interruptions to economic activities. No Bazooka For Consumers China’s household consumption, which accounts for about 40% of the country’s aggregate demand, has been a weak link in the economy during the past two years. Last week’s Politburo meeting pledged to stabilize employment, create new jobs and encourage hiring from small and medium enterprises (SMEs). However, there was no mention of any large-scale fiscal transfer to households via cash or subsidy payments, which suggests that pro-consumer measures are not in the stimulus package. Chart 5Retail Sales In China Have Been The Weak Link In The Economy In The Current Cycle China’s retail sales growth has been muted in the current business cycle, a deviation from past economic recoveries when a revival in the general economy and moderate pro-consumption stimulus helped to lift household spending growth substantially above the rate of nominal GDP expansion (Chart 5). Since the pandemic, however, government stimulus to the household sector has been insufficient to revive consumption, due to the negative impact lockdowns have on both labor market demand and the service sector activities. Compared with the US and Europe, China’s fiscal transfer to the household sector has been very limited since the first wave of COVID in early 2020 (Chart 6). Local governments handed out vouchers in Q2 2020 aimed at boosting consumption, but the amounts were dismal and have had a minimal effect on the sector. Chart 6IMF Fiscal Monitor Database: Fiscal Response To The COVID-19 Pandemic Presently the RMB value in direct payments to the household sector is even smaller: some cities including Shenzhen distributed consumption vouchers ahead of the May holiday week. Nonetheless, the total value of consumption vouchers this year is estimated at around RMB 2billion. The amount, even with a multiplier effect of 3 on consumption, will be less than 0.1% of China’s monthly retail sales in nominal value. Hence, the coupons are unlikely to make any significant difference to the aggregate household spending. Bottom Line: Household consumption will be severely curtailed as lockdowns wreak havoc on the economy and household income, and the government so far has not provided meaningful direct transfers to the public. Rebound In Housing Demand Doubtful The Politburo encouraged local governments to further relax local housing policies, such as lowering mortgage rates and down payment ratios, and easing restrictions on home sales and purchases. However, we do not expect that these policies alone will restore homebuyers’ confidence amid short-term factors such as COVID outbreaks/lockdowns, and longer-term factors like slowing household income growth, high household debt and poor demographics (Chart 7A and 7B). Chart 7AProperty Market Is Challenged By Slower Household Income Growth, High Household Income Debt And Poor Demographics Chart 7BProperty Market Is Challenged By Slower Household Income Growth, High Household Income Debt And Poor Demographics China’s household sector was struggling prior to recent lockdowns. The growth rate of national disposable income per capita slowed by more than two percentage points (in nominal terms) in Q1 this year compared with Q4 2019 (Chart 7A, top panel). In addition, the PBoC’s quarterly urban depositor survey (released before the Shanghai lockdown) in Q1 showed subdued confidence in future household income (Chart 8). Households’ willingness to save hit a record high and is even more elevated than in early 2020; on the other hand, the propensity to invest has dropped to a multi-year low (Chart 9). Chart 8Chinese Households' Subdued Confidence In Future Income Chart 9More Households Intend To Save Than To Invest Chart 10Chinese Households' Declining Appetite For Purchasing Real Estate Assets Despite lower interest rates and easier monetary conditions, Chinese consumers’ medium- to long-term loans continued to trend down in Q1, which indicates a declining appetite for purchasing real estate assets and durable goods (Chart 10). COVID-related restrictions have exacerbated matters and weighed heavily on the demand for housing. Home sales from 30 Chinese cities were down by 56% in April from a year ago (Chart 11). House prices have started to deflate in tier-3 cities. Deflation will likely spread to tier-1 and -2 cities due to a pandemic-driven decline in income and confidence. Furthermore, the unemployment rate has picked up, especially among younger workers (Chart 12). Job and income dynamics normally improve after the overall economic cycle bottoms. Therefore, without any measures to boost household income, the demand for housing will remain a drag on the economy in the near term. Chart 11Home Sales Worsened In April Amid COVID Flareups In Major Cities Chart 12Labor Market Dynamics Deteriorated Rapidly Bottom Line: The real estate market has been vital to business cycle recoveries in China since 2009. However, the property market will not recover anytime soon without a substantial boost to household income and a normalization in social and economic activities. Investment Conclusions The policy rhetoric from the Politburo meeting helped to shore up market confidence last Friday. Nevertheless, we do not think that the stimulus measures will be sufficient to produce a rapid business cycle recovery or a sustainable stock market rally (Chart 13A and 13B). Chart 13AIt Is Too Early To Call A Bottoming In Chinese Stocks Chart 13BIt Is Too Early To Call A Bottoming In Chinese Stocks Given the negative forces from rolling lockdowns and shrinking demand, China’s economy requires a massive government stimulus via direct transfers to households and SMEs. Yet, Beijing is neither ready to abandon its dynamic zero-Covid policy nor provide “irrigation-type” stimulus, especially for households and the property market. The policy stimulus measures announced so far still fall short of what is required to lift the economy. In light of the constraints on household consumption and the property market, economic growth in China is set to underwhelm and stock prices will likely underperform their global counterparts. Jing Sima China Strategist jings@bcaresearch.com Strategic Themes Cyclical Recommendations
Executive Summary Three Problems For European EPS The Chinese economic slowdown in response to COVID lockdowns represents a major headwind for European profits in 2022. Weaker global growth creates another hurdle. The energy crisis is the third major problem for European profit growth this year. European profits must be revised downward for 2022, but the impact on 2023 EPS will be small. Cyclical sectors are particularly exposed to these three headwinds, which will hurt profitability this year. The recent relative strength in industrials and materials earnings is likely to buckle in response to weaker global growth, while the defensive characteristics of healthcare and communication services will shine. Within defensive sectors, favor healthcare and communication services versus utilities and consumer staples. Bottom Line: A downward revision of European profits will constrain the ability of European equities to rally in the coming quarters; however, it does not portend another major down leg in European stocks. Nonetheless, the downward revision still points to further underperformance of cyclical equities. Within the defensive sectors, healthcare and communication services are more appealing than utilities and consumer staples shares. The earnings season has begun. According to the MSCI index, Eurozone profit margins are at a 14-year high following a sharp rebound in profits after the pandemic-induced collapse of 2020. Faced with a war in Ukraine and surging inflation, investors worry that this robust profit picture will not last. We share these worries. The near-term outlook for European profits has deteriorated significantly. While the inflation surge amplified by the Ukrainian crisis is an important problem for European firms, it is not the only one. European businesses must also cope with the effect of a growth slowdown in the US goods sector. Moreover, Chinese growth is likely to plunge in response to the tightening lockdowns across the country. As a result, we fear that current earnings estimates for 2022 are too optimistic. Nonetheless, European stocks are unlikely to collapse further. The valuation cushion amassed during the first quarter market shake-out already embeds some downside for 2022 earnings. Additionally, 2023 earnings have much more limited downside than this year’s EPS. Three Problems For European EPS Chart 1European Earnings Profile Three major problems indicate that the current European earnings estimates for 2022 are too optimistic: namely, China’s economic slowdown, a global economic deterioration, and the consequences of the Ukrainian war on the European economy (Chart 1). China’s Slowdown This publication has regularly highlighted that, even if the Chinese credit impulse is already trying to bottom, the lagged effect of the previous slowdown in credit flows would continue to hurt European growth in the first half of 2022. China’s COVID outbreak and Beijing’s severe policy response only accentuate this headwind. European profits are even more sensitive to Chinese economic fluctuation than European economic activity, which points to a meaningful drag on profitability. Many relationships highlight our concerns: So far, the weakness in the Chinese credit impulse is still consistent with a rapid deterioration of forward earnings growth and could lead to a contraction in forward EPS (Chart 2, top panel). The Chinese new orders index is falling rapidly. The elevated likelihood that China endures even more lockdowns in the coming months implies a sharper drop in orders and further weakness in European EPS (Chart 2, second panel). The CNY is depreciating again, which often coincides with a deflationary shock in global industrial goods that Europe produces. Unsurprisingly, a weaker RMB correlates well with narrowing operating profit margins in the Eurozone (Chart 2, bottom panel). Korean business conditions are deteriorating in response to the softening of the Chinese economy. A weaker RMB will further hurt business sentiment in the peninsula, especially if Chinese lockdowns broaden. The Korean economy is a key barometer of global business conditions because of its high cyclicality. BCA’s EM strategy team anticipates an additional softening in Korea, which portends weaker European profits and margins (Chart 3). Chart 2China's Troubles Trouble Europe Profits Chart 3Listen to Korea Global Economic Weakness The global growth weakness goes beyond China’s troubles. US economic activity is slowing down in response to higher yields, higher inflation, and the disappearance of pent-up demand following a splurge on goods by consumers during the pandemic. As a result, Q1 GDP growth fell to -1.4% from a quarterly annualized rate of 5.5% in Q4 2021. The weakness in the ISM New Orders-to-Inventory ratio points to continued softness through Q2. EM are not immune to these vulnerabilities either. EM consumers are suffering greatly from surging food and fuel costs. Moreover, EM interest rates continue to rise briskly and the ensuing liquidity removal points to fainter growth ahead. Chart 4The Weaker ISM NOI Is Worrisome The impact of weaker global economic activity on European earnings is straightforward: A falling US ISM New Orders-To-Inventories ratio is a prelude both to slower earnings growth and to narrower profit margins in the Eurozone (Chart 4). Global exports growth has collapsed to 5.5% from more than 20% prior year and is likely to deteriorate further. Historically, weaker global shipments are associated with a slowdown in European forward earnings growth (Chart 4, third panel). Global economic surprises have rebounded this year, but, as we showed two weeks ago, they are likely to move back below zero in the near future. This is a noisy series, but negative surprises often prompt downward revisions to earnings estimates. The Energy Shock Europe is facing an exceptional energy shock that is hurting the region’s growth prospects. Now that Russia is curtailing gas shipments to Poland and Bulgaria, more energy disruptions are likely, which will further hamper domestic growth prospects across the region, while simultaneously elevating the cost of goods sold for firms. However, not all countries will be hit equally by a Russian energy embargo among the major economies. Germany and Italy have the most to lose, while France and the UK are the least at risk (Chart 5). The impact of an oil supply shock on European earnings is negative. When oil prices rise because of strong global aggregate demand, European earnings handle rising energy prices well because the increasing sales volume creates a powerful offset. However, our simple model that accounts for the evolution of oil demand and global policy uncertainty highlights that we do not face a demand shock, but rather a supply shock (Chart 6), which implies that most sectors will suffer from higher energy prices. Chart 5Varying Vulnerabilities To Russia’s Energy Showdown Chart 6Oil's Rally Is Supply-Driven Chart 7European Margins Under Pressure The inflation passthrough from energy to everything else is not strong enough to protect profit margins. Yes, HICP is elevated, but European PPIs are rising much more rapidly. Historically, such an inability to pass on higher production costs results in slower European profits growth and contracting operating profit margins (Chart 7). The current weakness in consumer confidence and the expected drag on business confidence underscore that pricing power will likely deteriorate from here, which will accentuate the negative impact on profits from the current energy shock. Wage Costs: Not A Problem For Now Wage costs are the one bright spot for European profit margins. European negotiated wages are expanding at a very low rate of 1.6%. Unit labor costs are only expanding at 2.4%, a rate similar to last decade when European core inflation averaged 1%. Chart 8Wages Do Not Hurt Margins Historically, rising wage rates correlate with rising profitability, not declining margins (Chart 8). This relationship seems paradoxical, but European wages only increase when global aggregate demand is very strong. Due to the degree of operating leverage of European equities, the impact of robust aggregate demand on revenues swamps the impact of accelerating wage growth on production costs. Hence, it will probably take a wage growth rate much higher than the experience of the past 20 years for salaries to start hurting margins. While this is possible, we are many quarters away from this risk becoming reality. Bottom Line: European forward earnings estimates for 2022 are far too elevated in view of the headwinds European businesses are currently facing. The combination of weaker Chinese economic activity, slowing global growth, and a supply-driven energy shock will force significant downward revisions to this year’s EPS. Related Report European Investment StrategyPlenty Of Risks For Cyclical Stocks 2023 EPS should fare better. Chinese authorities are increasingly supporting their economy and this stimulus will impact activity when the lockdowns end. This process will prompt a boom later this year. Global growth will recover once the energy shock recedes. Decelerating European PPI will also help profit margins recover. Following their severe decline in the first quarter, European equities have already embedded a significant valuation cushion to compensate for the transitory shock to earnings. European stocks will not be able to advance meaningfully while 2022 earnings estimates weaken, but they are unlikely to make new lows either. Three Problems For Cyclicals vs Defensives The same three factors that hurt the outlook for European profits for 2022 also confirm that cyclical equities should underperform defensives in the near term. China’s Slowdown Cyclicals are extremely sensitive to a Chinese economic slowdown: The past weakness in the Chinese credit impulse is consistent with a further downgrade of the profit expectations for European cyclicals stocks compared to that of their defensive peers (Chart 9). A deterioration in China’s PMI New Orders heralds a period of weakness in the earnings of cyclical equities. A weak Chinese yuan leads to poor relative earnings (Chart 9). The deterioration in Korean business confidence and the poor performance of Korean equities also leads to weakness in both the earnings and profit margins of cyclical equities relative to those of defensive stocks (Chart 9). Global Growth Weakness The earnings outlook for cyclical sectors relative to defensives is negatively affected by slowing global economic activity: A deterioration in global economic surprises often results in a period of anemic cyclicals’ earnings (Chart 10). The rapidly declining ISM New Orders-to-Inventories ratio is synonymous with underperforming cyclicals’ earnings as well as a contraction in their relative profit margins because of their heightened degree of operating leverage (Chart 10). Weaker global exports confirm the continued risks to cyclicals’ earnings. Chart 9China Is A Threat To Cyclical Equities Chart 10Global Growth Threatens Cyclical Stocks The Energy Shock There is no clear relationship between energy prices and the outlook for the profits of cyclical equities relative to those of defensive stocks. Nonetheless, we may deduce that, if elevated energy prices hurt aggregate profits, they will also hurt cyclical profits, since the latter exacerbate the fluctuation of the former. Moreover, Europe’s elevated stagflation risk is consistent with sagging profits for cyclicals relative to those of defensives, because cyclicals experience greater pain from deteriorating economic activity than the benefit they enjoy from higher inflation. Bottom Line: The problems faced by the Chinese economy as well as the risks to global growth are consistent with an underperformance of the profits of cyclical stocks compared to those of defensive equities. Moreover, while higher energy prices are not necessarily a problem for cyclical equities, the elevated perceived stagflation risk is consistent with downward revisions for the relative earnings of cyclicals. This picture indicates that cyclical equities are still vulnerable to some downside relative to the broad market in the near term. A Look at Individual Sectors Chart 11Sectoral Degrees Of Operating Leverage We may distill the impact of China’s problems, the global economic slowdown, and the energy shock on sectoral earnings. A simple starting point is to look at their degree of operating leverage. Based on this observation, financials and consumer discretionary stocks are the sectors most at risk from weaker revenue growth, while utilities are the least exposed (Chart 11). A more complete picture may be gleaned from each sector’s pricing power. Energy Chart 12Improving Energy Margins The energy sector enjoys a significant margin tailwind from the oil supply shock (Chart 12). Nonetheless, this boost is long in the tooth and a pullback is likely if Brent falls toward the $94/bbl level expected by BCA’s Commodity & Energy team in the second half of 2022, and $88/bbl level in 2023. Hence, it is likely that the near-term benefits for the energy sector’s profits are already fully discounted and that the sector could suffer a significant setback in the coming quarters. Industrials The pricing power of industrials (as approximated by the gap between CPI and PPI) is still strong, which creates a tailwind for relative earnings (Chart 13). However, this robustness is under threat in the current environment in which global industrial production, global trade, and global capital goods orders are decelerating (Chart 14). Hence, a period of downgrade for the earnings of industrials relative to the broad market is likely in the coming months. Chart 13Robust Pricing Power For Industrials... Chart 14...But For How Long? Financials Chart 15Financials Are Under Siege The relative pricing power1 of financials is rapidly deteriorating, despite the recent increase in German yields (Chart 15). Moreover, it is likely to remain weak in a context in which core CPI has yet to decrease. Finally, the potential for a European recession in 2022, or at least, a severe growth slowdown, should lift non-performing loans. As a result, this sector’s earnings could experience a significant downgrade in the near term. Tech The sector’s pricing power was in an uptrend, but it has started to deteriorate in recent quarters (Chart 16). This evolution indicates that that tech earnings and profit margins are likely to suffer relative to the broad market, especially in light of the sector’s high degree of operating leverage. Consumer Discretionary Stocks This sector is suffering from a complete collapse of its pricing power (Chart 17). Additionally, tumbling consumer confidence in Europe and around the world is a significant drag on near-term sales. Consequently, earnings growth as well as profit margins are likely to lag the overall market. Chart 16Crucial Tech Tailwind Dwindling Chart 17A Problem For Consumer Discretionary Stocks Materials European materials sector’s profit margins stand at a 19-year high compared to that of the broad market. However, relative profit growth has collapsed. The bad news for the sector is that its pricing power is rapidly deteriorating because of surging input costs. It suggests that relative profit growth will become negative as relative profit margins contract (Chart 18). Utilities The pricing power of utilities is plunging because retail electricity prices are not rising as fast as input costs. The negative impact of this adverse pricing on profit margins is consequential (Chart 19). Governments around Europe are likely to continue to pressure this sector to limit the increase in electricity prices to households, which means that utilities are likely to lag other defensive sectors. Chart 18Materials' Outlook Deteriorating Materially Chart 19Crunch Time For Utilities Consumer Staples Chart 20Staples Under Duress The consumer staples sector is facing a similar pricing power problem to that of consumer discretionary stocks: input costs are rising rapidly relative to selling prices (Chart 20). Nonetheless, the earnings of staples will prove more resilient than that of their discretionary counterparts because the staples’ sales volumes are less sensitive to both deteriorating global consumer confidence and falling household real incomes. However, consumer staples equities have already greatly outperformed consumer discretionary stocks. Thus, much of the good news in terms of relative earnings is well discounted and the additional outperformance will be limited. Healthcare Chart 21Healthcare Stocks Still Have Pricing Power The pricing power of the healthcare sector remains positive, but it is not as strong as it was ten years ago. Hence, profits growth has scope to improve further compared to the rest of the market (Chart 21). Beyond favorable pricing power dynamics, the industry is insulated from weaker global growth relative to the rest of the broad market. Importantly, the healthcare sector sports one of the lowest degrees of operating leverage in Europe, which will also boost its relative profitability in the current environment. Healthcare is our top defensive sector right now, despite its valuation premium. Communication Services Chart 22Telecom Will Prove Resilient The profit growth and profit margins of the European communication services sectors are already under duress because pricing power remains negative. Nonetheless, the contraction in relative growth rates of earnings is extended (Chart 22). Telecom revenues did not benefit from a boost when the economy rebounded after the economic contraction in 2020. This stability is now an asset because the sector will not struggle from slowing global economic activity. In this context, the cheap communication services sector remains an attractive defensive play in Europe. Bottom Line: Looking at sectors individually confirms that the outlook for profit growth is worse for cyclicals than it is for defensive stocks. The recent relative strength in industrials and materials earnings is likely to buckle in response to weaker global growth, while the defensive characteristics of healthcare and communication services will shine. Utilities are under stress, as they stand at the confluence of higher energy prices and the explicit desire of politicians to limit the impact of these higher energy costs on households. Favor healthcare and communication services versus utilities and consumer staples. Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 In the case of financials, we use core CPI as a proxy for the sector’s costs. Eurostat does not publish a PPI for the sector and the main costs are related to labor costs. Tactical Recommendations Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations